Attila's Treasure | |||||
Stephan Grundy | |||||
Bantam Books, 550 pages | |||||
A review by Neil Walsh
However, I think I made a mistake by reading Attila's Treasure before
I had read Rhinegold. Maybe it was only a mistake for me, but by the time
I got to the end of Attila's Treasure there were enough unanswered questions
in my mind that I decided I had better read Rhinegold. Now it may be that
if I had been more perceptive, less particular, or more intimately familiar
with the events told in the Volsung/Nibelung cycle, I would not have had these
nagging questions and this novel would have stood more firmly on its own merit.
Nevertheless, it is with all due credit to the writing style and ability of Grundy
that I considered it worthwhile to immediately pick up his first novel and devour
it unflinchingly to the end, until all my questions were satisfactorily
answered. And yes, I found my answers. So, if you've already read and
enjoyed Rhinegold, don't miss out on Attila's Treasure. If you
have not yet read Rhinegold, my advice would be to read it first before
tackling Attila's Treasure.
Now, having said that, I believe Attila's Treasure is actually the
better book. I remember reading one critic who accused Grundy of getting too
caught up in the anthropological details in Rhinegold, making it more
dense than it might otherwise have been. I can't say I disagree with that,
but on the other hand it didn't bother me. Attila's Treasure probably goes
into even more historical anthropological detail, but its story is only a fragment
of the multi-generational tragedy that unfolds in Rhinegold. This makes
Attila's Treasure a tighter work, and in my opinion a better read -- once
you have the background necessary to avoid those nagging questions.
Neil Walsh is the Reviews Editor for the SF Site. He lives in contentment, surrounded by books, in Ottawa, Canada. |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide