Maximum Light | ||||||||
Nancy Kress | ||||||||
Tor Books, 245 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by Donna McMahon
Protagonist Shana Walders, for one, has no interest in politics. She has precisely one ambition -- to join the
regular army. Unfortunately, even in an era when healthy 19-year-olds are scarce, the military isn't
interested in a kid who's already accumulated a criminal record and seven National Service
reprimands. But Shana is convinced that her rejection was engineered by a congressional committee she
briefly appeared before as a witness. When Shana testified that she had seen highly-illegal vivi-factured
chimps, the committee treated her like a liar, so Shana is determined to prove to them she wasn't lying.
One committee member, eminent scientist Dr. Nick Clementi, believes Shana but he knows that political and
industry appointees don't want to rock the boat. If the fertility crisis is publicly linked to a host of
common industrial chemicals, the economic and political fallout will be immense.
And Nick isn't up for fighting this battle, even though he likes the belligerant, lively Shana. Nick has
other problems. He's 75, he's dying of a brain disease, and he hasn't yet found a way to tell his beloved wife.
Meanwhile, Cameron Atui is on the verge of becoming an internationally famous ballet dancer. He loves
dancing and delights in the resulting attention -- if only the horrific dreams would stop. What happened to
him that was so terrible that doctors decided to erase his memory?
This is a remarkably tight, well-written short novel. Kress's characters are strong and her decision to use
the first person present tense for her young people and past tense for the old man contributes to the feel of
those characters. In particular, I thought she succeeded very well at portraying Shana -- an angry young
woman with attention deficit, learning disabilities, and poor impulse control (all symptoms of
pollutant-caused endocrine disruption), but who nonetheless manages to engage the reader's sympathy.
The only real weakness in this book is an anti-climatic ending. I don't think regular SF readers will be at
all shocked or even much surprised by the ultimate revelations of what the "bad guys" were up to. And Kress's
resolution of the plot struck me as unrealistic. Her villains were far too easily defeated.
I also found myself getting aggravated with Kress's assumption that an 80% decline in human fertility would
be a disaster. Hell, I'd see it as an ecological miracle, albeit with some social and economic problems attached.
And I found myself nitpicking at details -- for example, she assumes that developers would build small houses
for smaller families. That sounds logical, until you consider that family size has been decreasing in North
America for the last 50 years and houses just keep getting bigger.
Still, those niggles are my problem, not Kress's, and it was a pleasure to read a novel with intellectual meat
in it worthy of debate. Maximum Light certainly deserved its Nebula nomination. It's one of the best
examples I've seen of taking an idea, researching it, and extrapolating it into a solid, entertaining book.
Donna McMahon discovered science fiction in high school and fandom in 1977, and never recovered. Dance of Knives, her first novel, was published by Tor in May, 2001, and her book reviews won an Aurora Award the same month. She likes to review books first as a reader (Was this a Good Read? Did I get my money's worth?) and second as a writer (What makes this book succeed/fail as a genre novel?). You can visit her website at http://www.donna-mcmahon.com/. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide