| Amazing Stories, Winter 2000 | |||||||||||||||
|
A review by David Soyka
Babylon 5 fans presumably will be interested in the cover story, as it deals with the further adventures
of G'Kar and Lyta, who were evidently popular characters on the series. Taken just as that -- a "short storyization," if you
will, of a TV episode -- it's an okay effort. Normally, I'd leave it at that, because even while recognizing there's
something to be said for the talent it takes to craft a workmanlike story, it's just too easy to take pot shots at
media-related fiction. But the sidebar profile which depicts Straczynski striving to "address the concept of life's
higher purpose" and the "search for meaning beyond oneself" in his Babylon 5 fiction calls out for
comment. I mean, cut me a break! The plot resolution of "Genius Loci" hinges on a hoary SF device -- posing an unanswerable
question to a superior intelligence as a means of overcoming it -- that's a cliché even in media terms, having
been used in the original Star Trek (which was famous for appropriating classic SF storylines without
giving due credit) as well as another, much superior, 60s series, The Prisoner. (The latter, by the way,
is more truly SF than other small screen attempts at the genre, perhaps in part because it ran, having said what
it wanted to say, by design for only one season. Interestingly, despite a cult following, it has spawned
relatively few spin-offs; I'm aware of only a series of graphic novels and a novelization by Thomas Disch, currently out-of-print).
That media fiction rarely rises above the conventional is implied in The Observatory column by Kristine Kathryn Rusch
(ironically enough, since she herself is a prolific writer of media-inspired novels). In suggesting contemporary works
that one day might become classic SF in the tradition of Brave New World or Stranger in a Strange Land,
media tie-ins are conspicuously absent from her list (though Rusch does cite the original Star Trek series
as a "foundation for [her] love for SF").
One story Rusch thinks deserving of classic-status is Harlan Ellison's "Repent Harlequin! Said the Ticktockman!" A sort
of contemporary take on that parable of nonconformity is "Shadow of the Mothaship" by Cory Doctorow. I'm not about to
hazard a guess about whether people will be reading it with reverence four decades later as we do today with Ellison's
short story, but it does posit a bizarre reality that, like the best speculative fiction, reflects the problems and
issues of the current milieu. Doctorow's style reminds me of Paul DiFilippo, who is also represented here by
"Working for the U," the "U" being a cosmic entity that employs historical and fictional characters to set right
certain people's misconceptions about the workings of the universe. In contrast to media-fiction that is typically
self-referential, both in terms of plotlines and the genre (Straczynski's story makes reference to an "Asimov class"
of spaceship, nudge, nudge), a full appreciation of DiFilippo's story requires broader intellectual horizons, with his allusions to
Ambrose Bierce, the Amazing Randi, and Whitley Strieber, as well as ET.
Howard Waldrop treads similar landscapes as DiFilippo -- meaning he's just as weird -- and his "London, Paris, Banana,"
about the adventures of a trio of robots that have survived humanity, is no exception. Here Waldrop echoes the genre's
classic advocacy of space travel in suggesting that the only rationale for extraterrestrial exploration is the same
as for climbing Mt. Everest -- when the need to embark on such adventures simply because "it's there" withers, the
human spirit withers.
Another favourite SF subject as venerated as space travel is the Frankenstein monster. I don't know how many SF
fans have actually read Mary Shelley's gothic novel (and if you haven't, you should), but its influence is
pervasive. Of course, most people, even people who don't read, much less read SF, are familiar with the Boris
Karloff movie bastardization. While the cinematic Frankenstein has its charms (only echoing the
complexity of its source material), its immediate sequel (and of course there are more sequels than there should
have been), The Bride of Frankenstein, is actually the better movie. Elizabeth Braswell's "The Bride" takes
an interesting riff in considering what might have happened had the monster gotten his desired mate. While this
could have degenerated into a reactionary feminist polemic, positing a "dysfunctional" relationship between the
emotionally-clueless-because-he's-male monster and his much-more-sensitive-female partner, the monster manifested
in the ending offers insights that transcend mere male-bashing.
More towards the conventional, in the sense of dealing with the "science" of science fiction, is the second and
concluding installment of Frederik Pohl's "Hatching the Phoenix." The plot is less important than the idea that
we can literally see the past because of the time it takes for light from far-flung galaxies to travel to our
perception, along with a meditation on the general stupidity and self-destructiveness of so-called intelligent
creatures. Classic SF, indeed, from a classic SF author.
Monte Cook's "Born in Secrets" also delves into well-trodden territory, that of alien possession. At first I
dismissed this as a nicely written, but "been there done that" sort of story. But when I realized that the means
by which the alien intelligence is transmitted to its hosts is the very same that I'm using to read the story, I
began to have second thoughts. Who among us cannot claim to have been transformed into something else by reading a book?
A transformation of another sort takes place in the centre-piece story, the one that instead of the Babylon 5
tableau should be on the cover, "Mud" by Nina Kiriki Hoffman. The author combines several classic themes -- a coming
of age story, first contact, an inversion of "Terraforming" in which the reformulated terrain is human
consciousness -- and blends it together in a way that transcends the limited Twilight Zone feel of the
aforementioned "Born in Secrets." A wonderful, thoughtful story that the likes of Straczynski could take a lesson
from in what constitutes a real literary investigation into the search for identity and the choices we make that
define us as uniquely human. SF, in other words, that is truly amazing.
David Soyka is a former journalist and college teacher who writes the occasional short story and freelance article. He makes a living writing corporate marketing communications, which is a kind of fiction without the art. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide