Electric Velocipede | ||||||
Trent Walters
Good SF critics are especially difficult to find. Probably the best
contemporaries are Gwyneth Jones, John Kessel, and John Clute. If you can,
lay your hands on a copy of Jones' collection of non-fiction Deconstructing
Starships -- possibly the best single non-fiction collection on contemporary
SF (here you can also find her critical works).
Please understand that no particular critic is under attack. Neither do I
address solely the reviews that Electric Velocipede has received thus far but, on the whole,
the gamut of genre reviews. Tim Powers warns writers not to review since,
no matter how fair you attempt to write them, toes inevitably get stepped
on. Is reviewing a waste of time? Some days I agree, but on others I feel
reviews play a crucial role in the dialogue of literature and may help, one
day, get deserving SF works on Pulitzer reading lists.
Contrary to popular opinion in or out of the genre, I see the book critic
serving two crucial functions. First is to get the word out. I am far too
slow to do that. Thank God for all the speedy readers and writers out
there! I'd hate for every reviewer to be like me. If that were the case,
Dangerous Visions would only now be receiving its trickle of reviews. These
reviewers have made a far weightier contribution to the genre than I.
However, the current climate of reviewing does lack. I do not mention
reviewers' names because that would place focus on the particular
inconsequentials and away from a larger general need. Which leads me to my
second point of the critic's function: to suggest exactly where the
reviewed work succeeds and, when it does not, where it does not.
With this review, I want to issue that challenge. I put a helluva lotta
sweat into these reviews. Writers deserve reviews that put more effort and
thought into the works under scrutiny -- maybe not as much I put into them,
but more than at present. I get upset alongside (or sometimes for) the
writers or editors, when they have done something well, get slighted by a
cursory or negative review without substantiating precisely why.
Are critics wasting their time? Should they not risk upsetting others in
order to improve the genre they love? Should they be satisfied with the
status quo? I am open to have my mind changed. Feel free to email me your
thoughts.
Unfortunately reviews of Electric Velocipede have not been enlightening,
reading more like a laundry list of the contents page rather than an
analysis of the magazine's specific strengths and weaknesses, giving a
paltry handful of paragraphs mention to three magazines (averaging a
sentence per work). Why write but to enlighten? What other purpose does
the written word serve? Most importantly, the critics pass over editor John
Klima's monumental discovery: Catherine Dybiec Holm who, if editors are
willing to take the chance that Klima has, may turn out to be the genre's
next Connie Willis or Nancy Kress.
The love the genre has for one-draft stories must stem from the romantic
notion of effortless talent of someone like Harlan Ellison. Yet it isn't
for the vast majority of great writers. Joyce Carol Oates leaked out her
revisions in Jay Woodruff's most illuminating book, Writer's Guide, A Piece
of Work: Five Writers Discuss Their Revisions. I say "illuminating"
because I learned that writers of genius don't simply revise great stories
into masterpieces, but even Oates begins with a common writer's turd. She
just happens to know how to spin turds into gold.
Likewise, Catherine Dybiec Holm amazes with her ability to revise. Having
seen her first drafts at Clarion, I knew she had heart, characterization,
and character development down pat, but having grown used to the jerky
movements of the computer-animated characters of most fiction, I hadn't
known her subtle narrative genius, her ability to draw deftly human
characters. After two pages, I realized Holm's "Transcendence" could have
stood without blushing next to a story by Oates or John Steinbeck or any writer
of literary merit. I was in awe. My god, I thought, is this our Cathy
Holm of Clarion 2002? Now I wonder when (not if) the rest of the genre
will come to recognize her talents. Look at her eye for detail:
Holm's second contribution to Electric Velocipede, "The Last Great Chance," appeared in issue
three. A cross-genre, interstitial, magic realist (or whatever rosy in-vogue
title of not-quite-fantasy-yet-not-quite-realism -- A rose by any other
name... (Shakespeare) -- A rose is a rose is a rose (Gertrude Stein)) story
about those who can see the UFO in Bardy's backyard and the beloved
perennial tale of aliens presiding in judgment over humans relies again on
her strengths of heart, charm, and thematically satisfying conclusions but
this time lacks her previous effort's subtlety, swinging even at times into
excess: "His throat felt like a thousand molten ramrods had been shoved
deep into its soft flesh, back and forth, by a laughing devil" and "Floor.
Patio door. His trailer house. Did he sleep on the floor? Who cared? Me,
myself and I. He giggled, then grimaced at the pain of hearing his own
voice." Her lapses into nineteenth century abstract character description
don't work as well, either: "By the time he drove into town, Bardy's head
pounded with inadequacy." With friends like this Walters pendejo, who
needs enemies? Still, it's wonderful to see an editor willing to turn new
authors into veterans to be admired.
Mark Rich, who possibly appears three times in one issue with this story
"Fling But a Stone," a strong poem described below and a third surrealist
piece of a series concerning Mr. Brain under the guise of pseudonym Ezra
Pines (at least Rich suspiciously web-hosts Pines' bibliography and little
biography) co-authored with Richard Bowes, gives the readers an idea story
in the discursive tradition of Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, and Ayn Rand, but unlike those
writers at their worst (Robots of Dawn, Strangers in a Strange Land, and
Atlas Shrugged) Rich knows when to shut his characters up. Readers,
however, should temper my appreciation for Rich's discursions with the
knowledge that I share similar anti-corporation sentiments home-grown from
the impersonal corporate shenanigans experienced in person, on the news, and
to friends of friends. News of the World corporation controls the world by
choosing to let only the rich and Fortune 10 -- har! -- companies in on what's
happening. Unfortunately, a poor reporter stumbles into possessing a copy
of their elusive newspaper, and now the News has to stop the lower class
from possessing the secrets of the upper class. Rich does a fine job
slapping on a metaphorical house, twisting the story away from reader
expectations, multiple times, and allowing multi-layered readings, one of
which his bio on the contributor page may allude to and which never slides
into a simplistic answer to a complex problem.
And another thing -- said the Ayn-Randish character who couldn't shut
up -- for some readers, reading a story without multiple layers or subtlety
or anything else that gives words meaning beyond their surface, is like a
simple melody without harmony, or like how Dorothy felt about the black and
white Kansas compared to the technicolor of Oz: there's more to appreciate.
The Richard Bowes and Ezra Pines title, "Mr. Brain and the Island of Lost
Socks," probably tells the story best. Unless, as the line "'That was so
long ago,' said the lampshade, 'in another time, under a different title,
one never published.'" may suggest, the work relies on reader familiarity
with the previous stories, this is simply a surrealist romp with playful
images, implied by images such as a penguin that continue to be introduced
even in the denouement (if denouement can be applied to this work). A
personal favorite has to be "He grabbed his doughnut hole in one hand and
slipped through it, emerging immediately onto the Island of Lost Socks."
Pardon if I'm pedantic but what wonderful play on what a doughnut hole says
in name but is in reality. Also, aside from word play, the story has
speculative fun as well: "'I traded eyes with Mrs. Noggin'" and "she and
Mr. Brain had given in to fashion of having the plastic dome atop their
heads be clear acrylic, rather than colored polyethylene. The visible brain
look was irresistible." Surrealism, one could extrapolate if he had read
André Breton's manifesto,
does not have to mean as this does not.
Harold Gross' short (vignette being, in my mind, a slight to the author)
"Wreckage" initially excited me, demonstrating what Klima discussed as the
best use of typography: allowing different characters to speak offstage, so
to speak. The story deals with the victim of an airplane explosion who
attempts to survive it. But the author flinched at the last second and
turned the story into a mundane, albeit black, slapstick. One can only
imagine how beautiful the story might have been had the author sat on it
until the proper discourse chose itself. Humor can be a powerful tool, but
too often in SF, it weakly plays it as an end instead of as a means to an end
that builds upon all its parts.
Another promising but unfulfilled start was Jason Henderson's ghost story
"Jackson Hole," beginning with a man in search of ghosts. He encounters a
frightening one who trips him on a steep slope. Once the protagonist saves
his own hide, the story goes downhill: why the protagonist searches for
ghosts or these ghosts in particular is never mentioned.
"The More Things Change" by Michael Kelly reverses the problem of the two
latter-most stories. This title harkens to a pre-Golden Age (or at least a
lack of concern for SF except as window dressing) conceit of bidding on a
space-transport job. A couple goes in together with a shyster who
double-crosses the pair by surprising them in the Void (if they're in the
Void, why didn't they see the shyster coming?). However, making the couple
gay with an interloper does add intrigue, making one wonder what this story
could have been with a better speculative conceit (one cannot write
speculative fiction without speculation). The title -- particularly what is
left unsaid in the title -- fits the subject matter like a glove.
"A Few Notes Upon Finding a Green Alien Baby Figurine in a Specimen Trap at
Longitude__, and Latitude__ Antarctica: Dr. Larry Gilchrist, Ph.D. as
transcribed by Jeff Vandermeer" by Jeff Vandermeer is an interesting
pastiche entertainment that combines, via the title, the nineteenth century
SF proclivity for authenticity, a Weird Tales penchant for mixing modern
science with horror, a Poe taste in madness, and a dash of the modern absurd
via the alien baby. Dr. Larry Gilchrist is a loner who hates the small
company he keeps in Antarctica. They drill through the ice to study "seal
shit" but find a plastic alien baby instead, the portent of which Gilchrist
insists upon understanding... to the paranoid exclusion of others.
Issue Three of Electric Velocipede leads off with the aforementioned Holm story and moves on to a
reprint of Neal Barrett Jr.'s first sale to Writer's Digest: a series of
infamous rejection letters that might have been.
Brendan Connell's "The Goddess Cup" about a botanist who searches for the
key to his eternal glory is a one-trick-pony short short (not a vignette
since it has development: a beginning, middle and end) in the style of
Rudyard Kipling -- not only for its prose style and Indian setting but for the
arrogance of its anti-hero and the comeuppance that comes a little too
conveniently.
Michael Penncavage's "North of the Sun, West of the Moon" shows enormous
promise as the opening chapters of an SF novel of spot-on speculation of the
indentured lower-class life aboard a space station. Having worked as a
lowly wiper in the engine room of a dredge ship, I wondered how Penncavage
retrieved an actual document from the future. But from there the story
shifts into a denouement in which the reader feels like he's walked into the
final scene of a locked-room mystery where the detective reveals the
murderer -- only in this case, the pirates and conspirators. If he'd split
this story and handled each idea (how a man can learn to live in such a
society and how the society can spawn an equal and opposite reaction -- the
heart and mind of a potentially great work), this story could kick off a
fine novel I'd be eager to read (Michael, if you've got your ears on and
you're interested, I'd love to share further thoughts).
What do you get when cross the sexual sensibility of John Varley, the
star-riggers of Jeffrey A. Carver, and the drama of a day-time soap? The
first two might have produced an intriguing Mendelian hybrid if only
Franklin, the protagonist in Rochelle Mitchell "Quantum Realities," could
have decided whether he wanted to meet his female dad, or whether he
was happy or upset to meet his dad, or whether he actually wanted to pilot
ships. Of course, indecision is a part of our tumultuous adolescence, but
we generally have a reason for our choices. On the other hand, the mood
swings could be clinical psychosis but are not addressed as such in the
text, so the effect feels unintended.
Sandra McDonald's "Opening Night" is a cute short short recasting a familiar
scene in science (though it fails to recognize true interactions between
labeled "races," as Hellie is the kind of gal not likely to cause tension
while her boyfriend and fellow actor Hy should actually play her
uncle/half-brother and is undoubtedly multi-sexual).
Vincent Sakowski bares his quirky synesthetic side in the hazards of
literally trading in your ears and radio eyes for a pair of "Television
Shoes." Add a little more descriptive talent, and Sakowski will be one of
those writers to watch.
Much of the better poetry from Electric Velocipede have politics at its
heart. "The Copernicker Rebbe," for instance -- the poem that Rich Horton
points out in his review -- has a lunar colonist lunatic enough to believe still in Mother
Earth's apocalyptic recovery (whether from pollution or war, it doesn't
hint). But politics are difficult to manage in a form that strives for
subtlety. The poet has to make it new somewhere -- whether through language
or perspective or idea -- but this one didn't quite pull off the Evil Knievel
Stunt of the Century though we shouldn't cast aspersions since few can (if
you'd like to read good American political poetry, try Carolyn Kizer or many
of the Eastern European poets like Czeslaw Milosz or Paul Celan).
As another critic recognized but failed to comment on why, the poem of
interest is Mark Rich's asking the fools' question, "Where on the River They
Cannot Build" (unless this reviewer is ignorant of building on rivers, the
question is reminiscent of -- or perhaps the next illogical step in -- the
parable of building a house upon sand)? The answer is equally foolish: "on
the ice." And why would one build birdhouses upon the river since they have
not been housed there before? "[T]he cawing crow/laughs at this newly solid
footing."
Neither reader nor book critic should judge an author by one story or poem
(likewise, an author shouldn't believe himself judged). If a maxim stating
the opposite were true, I'd have never investigated Martin Amis past his
inane cell-phone tale "State of England" in The New Yorker (the story does
have its moments, like the protagonist talking on his cell to his wife who
is a few feet away).
And so I foolishly nearly dismissed Kevin L. Donihe's poetry -- like his
"Identity" in issue two, a watered-down cyberpunk version of Jorge Luis
Borges' "Borges y yo" -- until I read his poems as a whole and discovered the
thematic key that makes them work: the interstitium between man and
machine. This new understanding brings up the question of whether the true
heart of SF poetry's art lies in the thematic chapbook. The vast majority
of SF poems are trite, discarding all the history and potentials of the
genre outside of SF and weighing heavily on a single speculative idea, which
is like Superman using nothing more than heat-ray vision to fight criminals
or Batman neglecting to use his utility belt. Donihe's are generally a cut
above the norm for SF poetry standards, but still lack. However, taken as a
whole, the alternate takes of man and machine at play makes me look forward
to seeing an entire chapbook of Donihe's investigations. Publishers take
note and forward me the final product for my eager consumption and public
touting.
John Klima turns his hand at critical analysis, reflecting on Vandermeer's
City of Saints and Madmen in issue three and typography in six different
books in issue two. The articles are well-written and are the main hitch in
my spending money I don't have on Vandermeer's and Mark Danielewski's latest
labors.
Bill Braun is a critic who seems to have turned a new leaf. His non-fiction
in issue two about filmmaker Dario Argento, while occasionally insightful,
babbles two out of four pages too long, using several paragraphs just to
tell the readers what he doesn't know. Braun in issue three, however,
redeems himself by sticking to specifics about the band Dream Theater and
its story in album form. Although Braun and Klima feel some guilt about
publishing this in a fiction magazine, their choice was a wise one, pointing
readers to new avenues and, hopefully if the band's fans read about this
review, pointing music fans toward other media avenues.
Since the majority of the reviewers compare the Electric Velocipede's choice in apples to
Lady Churchill's Rosebud Wristlet choice in oranges -- compared because we
judge magazines by their covers? -- this reviewer may as well. Both utilize
strong characterizations, but LCRW leans heavily toward style while EV leans
more to idea or theme in its character development. EV is all over the map
in genre and subject matter, but if a predilection for a style exists, it is
the kind of erudite and knowledgeable narration of nineteenth century
masters such as Wells, Kipling and O'Brien.
If the object of the written word is to inform about the world we live in,
then the Electric Velocipede writing crew have succeeded. If, however,
for you more discerning readers, the object of a magazine is to rise above
the competent work that tells a good story, then Klima offers a sampling
larger than most: Rich's multiple layers, Holm's narrative subtlety, and
Donihe's cumulative effects.
Trent Walters' work has appeared or will appear in The Distillery, Fantastical Visions, Full Unit Hookup, Futures, Glyph, Harpweaver, Nebo, The Pittsburgh Quarterly, Speculon, Spires, Vacancy, The Zone and blah blah blah. He has interviewed for SFsite.com, Speculon and the Nebraska Center for Writers. More of his reviews can be found here. When he's not studying medicine, he can be seen coaching Notre Dame (formerly with the Minnesota Vikings as an assistant coach), or writing masterpieces of journalistic advertising, or making guest appearances in a novel by E. Lynn Harris. All other rumored Web appearances are lies. |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide