|
|
|
|
|
Susan Matthews
Susan Matthews grew up across the US and in Europe and India. While
in the US Army, she served as the operations and security officer of a
combat support hospital. She works as an auditor for The Boeing Company and
recently graduated from Seattle University with an MBA in accounting.
She lives in Seattle.
Susan Matthews Website
ISFDB Bibliography
|
|
|
|
|
|
A review by Todd Richmond
Let me start by saying that I really wanted to like Prisoner of Conscience. After all, the summary
on the book cover sounded like a terrific premise:
"Andrej Koscuisko is an Inquisitor for the Bench federation of worlds. It is his duty
to root out -- quickly, efficiently, quietly -- anyone who would threaten the ruling order. Although
an Inquisitor is not supposed to feel outrage, weakness or pity, Andrej is, above all, a
man of honor. And now he must risk his career -- and perhaps his life -- exposing the truth that
lies behind the black walls of Domitt Prison."
In my mind, I thought an Inquisitor would be like an Investigator, as in Simon R.
Green's Deathstalker series -- a cool, calm, professional troubleshooter brought
in to uncover the truth, no matter what it takes. Susan Matthews' Inquisitors, unfortunately,
are just that. Professional torturers, operating under a specific Writ, which allows them to
carry out their profession. While Matthews attempts to make us like Koscuisko and empathize
with his character, the whole concept just doesn't work for me. A society where interstellar
space travel is a reality and it still resorts to physical torture? Instead of psychic probes,
mind-altering chemicals, or virtual reality assisted interrogation, Inquisitors use thumb screws,
whips and flails? Add slavery and concentration camps into the mix and you get a thoroughly
unpleasant story which I had a tough time finishing.
The book opens with a scene on Koscuisko's ship where a Security detail manages to stop a
group of saboteurs from destroying the ship. The consequences of this action are not seen until
the very end of the book. Then we see Koscuisko releasing a prisoner's bonds -- one of the scenes
which is supposed to make us aware of the fact that Koscuisko is a man of principles. Unauthorized
torture is not permitted, and Koscuisko releases the prisoner because Charges have not been
brought against this man. Yet he must do this secretly, which is a source of confusion for me. Matthews
has set up an elaborate system of authorized torture with very strict rules, and yet when one of
her Inquisitors finds an injustice, he cannot openly correct it. She reveals later that it is a matter
of politics that prevents him from doing so, yet his inability to correct this injustice openly
points to the flawed system. In her words:
"It was Koscuisko's responsibility to work through the holding areas, the ad hoc cells set
aside to hold the Nurail identified as prisoners as well as deportees. There was a difference -- deportees
were subject to privation and dehumanization, but they could not be put to torture merely because
they were no longer to be permitted to die on their own land."
To continue, Koscuisko is temporarily assigned to Domitt Prison, to carry his Writ of Torture
there. Accompanying him are his security patrol, a group of bond-involuntaries, conditioned prisoners
who have been fitted with a "governor" that inflicts pain when they disobey their master. Koscuisko
evidently treats his bond-involuntaries better than most, but slavery is still slavery. When one
is killed during an attack when Koscuisko first arrives, his show of grief is yet another plot
device to make us believe that he is different than the system of which he is a part.
To summarize the rest of the book, Koscuisko discovers that the Warden of Domitt Prison has been
using prisoners as slave labor and carrying out unauthorized torture. It takes him a while to find
out all the details, and more prisoners die in the meantime. During his investigation we are subjected
to descriptions of torture, abuse and a gruesome description of a man being burned alive in a
furnace. When he finally puts all the pieces together, again we see the flawed system. Even though
he has evidence, he is in danger of being replaced. His replacement would result in the
invalidation of the evidence and Charges which he was going to file. But in the end, he
reports the failure of Writ and the military comes in and cleans up the mess. At the end of
the book, his bond-involuntaries are freed of their bondage, because of their actions which
saved the ship in the very beginning of the book. And he buys the sex slave who was provided
to him at the prison, sets her up with a house and asks her to pray for the bond-involuntary
who died in the attack on him for the remainder of her Bond, the next twenty years. A contrived
ending, to say the least.
There are many things I didn't like about this book but I'll hit a few of
the major points.
One, Matthews' book is all about the Bench, the Writ of Torture and Inquisitors, but nowhere does
she explain the whole system of "justice". There are references to different levels
of Interrogation but no clear picture of what crimes warrant what levels. The use of
speaksera (truth serum?) is mentioned but either its use is not allowed or not common.
In any case, no rationale is supplied as to why physical torture is still in use in a
society with advanced technology. Inexcusable in my mind, as this is part of the basis
of this book.
Two, the book begins with weights and measures being measured in "eights". My first
thought was that maybe this race had only 8 fingers, yet I could find no reference to this
anywhere. Indeed, later in the book, this convention seemed to disappear (or maybe I stopped
noticing).
Third, and this is a really minor point, there are references to drinks which gave
me no indication what they were: shurla?, rhyti? Was he drinking an alcoholic drink, a coffee,
a hot cocoa, a fruit drink? Just one more bit of confusion.
To sum up, I really can't recommend this book. The protagonist is not someone who you can really
cheer for, and the plot is weak and confused. The whole premise is flawed, physical torture
amidst the high technology of interstellar flight and a supposedly powerful individual, the
Inquisitor, who has very little power to correct injustice. The threads of torture, slavery
and concentration camps running through the story add to the unpleasantness of the book. I
suggest that you give Susan R. Matthews' Prisoner of Conscience a pass and patronize
one of the other new, promising authors out there.
Copyright © 1998 by Todd Richmond
Todd is a plant molecular developmental biologist who has finally finished
23 years of formal education. He recently fled Madison, WI for the warmer
but damper San Francisco Bay Area and likes bad movies, good science
fiction, and role-playing games. He began reading science fiction at the
age of eight, starting with Heinlein, Silverberg, and Tom Swift books, and
has a great fondness for tongue-in-cheek fantasy àla Terry Pratchett, Craig
Shaw Gardner and Robert Asprin.
|