| Prisoner of Conscience | |||||
| Susan Matthews | |||||
| Avon EOS Books, 312 pages | |||||
| A review by Todd Richmond
The book opens with a scene on Koscuisko's ship where a Security detail manages to stop a
group of saboteurs from destroying the ship. The consequences of this action are not seen until
the very end of the book. Then we see Koscuisko releasing a prisoner's bonds -- one of the scenes
which is supposed to make us aware of the fact that Koscuisko is a man of principles. Unauthorized
torture is not permitted, and Koscuisko releases the prisoner because Charges have not been
brought against this man. Yet he must do this secretly, which is a source of confusion for me. Matthews
has set up an elaborate system of authorized torture with very strict rules, and yet when one of
her Inquisitors finds an injustice, he cannot openly correct it. She reveals later that it is a matter
of politics that prevents him from doing so, yet his inability to correct this injustice openly
points to the flawed system. In her words:
To summarize the rest of the book, Koscuisko discovers that the Warden of Domitt Prison has been
using prisoners as slave labor and carrying out unauthorized torture. It takes him a while to find
out all the details, and more prisoners die in the meantime. During his investigation we are subjected
to descriptions of torture, abuse and a gruesome description of a man being burned alive in a
furnace. When he finally puts all the pieces together, again we see the flawed system. Even though
he has evidence, he is in danger of being replaced. His replacement would result in the
invalidation of the evidence and Charges which he was going to file. But in the end, he
reports the failure of Writ and the military comes in and cleans up the mess. At the end of
the book, his bond-involuntaries are freed of their bondage, because of their actions which
saved the ship in the very beginning of the book. And he buys the sex slave who was provided
to him at the prison, sets her up with a house and asks her to pray for the bond-involuntary
who died in the attack on him for the remainder of her Bond, the next twenty years. A contrived
ending, to say the least.
There are many things I didn't like about this book but I'll hit a few of
the major points.
To sum up, I really can't recommend this book. The protagonist is not someone who you can really
cheer for, and the plot is weak and confused. The whole premise is flawed, physical torture
amidst the high technology of interstellar flight and a supposedly powerful individual, the
Inquisitor, who has very little power to correct injustice. The threads of torture, slavery
and concentration camps running through the story add to the unpleasantness of the book. I
suggest that you give Susan R. Matthews' Prisoner of Conscience a pass and patronize
one of the other new, promising authors out there.
Todd is a plant molecular developmental biologist who has finally finished 23 years of formal education. He recently fled Madison, WI for the warmer but damper San Francisco Bay Area and likes bad movies, good science fiction, and role-playing games. He began reading science fiction at the age of eight, starting with Heinlein, Silverberg, and Tom Swift books, and has a great fondness for tongue-in-cheek fantasy àla Terry Pratchett, Craig Shaw Gardner and Robert Asprin. | |||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2008 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide