| Even the Stones | ||||||||
| Marie Jakober | ||||||||
| Edge, 337 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by David Soyka
Of course, the story isn't advocating gunplay as necessarily a good thing, but rather that women should have the right to make
the same choices as men, unhampered by patriarchal-imposed expectations and restraints. Even if they are not very good choices
that don't fit into some mother-goddess worshipping, nourishing pacifist utopia.
The moral of "When I Changed" is that even when women are somehow allowed to make whatever choices they want, without
imposing values of "masculine" or "feminine" on what those choices should be, men will get involved to screw things up.
Russ very effectively and disturbingly and subtly and insidiously -- by which I mean to
say "artfully" -- conveys this theme in the space of five pages or so.
Which brings me to the problem I have with Marie Jakober's Even the Stones, which deals with the same issues but over
the course of 337 pages keeps browbeating me with its "message" to the point where it gets in the way of what is
an otherwise well-told -- if predictable -- romantic fantasy that is enjoyable, if you ignore the clumsy agit-prop.
The novel offers a standard fantasy medieval setting complete with a headstrong young queen in the midst of a dilemma
and a mysterious maverick soldier who comes to her aid -- and her bed -- along with generous helpings of mythological
mumbo-jumbo amidst various treacheries and battles between the forces of good and evil. In at least one respect where
Jakober does not adhere to formula, this is not the first volume in fat book trilogy, but a self-contained story with
little hint of, or need for, a sequel.
The nation of Kamilan (meant to sound a bit like Camelot?) is invaded by Prince Held (the symbolism of the name becomes
obvious shortly) of neighboring Dravia for the express purpose of kidnapping its young queen, Marwen, and taking her to
wife. Though forced into connubial relations, Marwen continues to defy Held, refusing to acknowledge him as neither her
sovereign nor her husband. In his own way, or at least in contrast to medieval mores, Held really isn't such a bad guy;
even despite testosterone notions that women are meant to be subservient, he is extremely tolerant of his young queen's
continuing rebellion to his authority. Marwen actually could have a soft spot for the guy, except that she objects to
the manner of his forceful courtship. Oh, if only he had been more of a gentleman, things might have turned out differently!
A chance meeting with Kiri, a sort of gypsy minstrel who is also a skilled bodyguard, in other words a woman in a man's
role, leads to a successful escape back to Kamilan. Held takes after her and probably would have recaptured her were
it not for the loyal Shadrack, freed slave and unconventional warrior whose decidedly unchivalrous guerrilla tactics are
tolerated by the nobility only so long as they work and, more importantly, Shadrack keeps his place. Indeed, Shadrack's
rescue of Marwen warrants less attention than that the manner in which he kills Held is considered dishonorable. As if
forcibly carrying off your sovereign and forcing her into an unwanted marriage isn't. But, of course, that's the point,
that men with their silly notions about honorable behavior take no notice of a woman's honor except as it relates to property rights.
Though Marwen is returned to her rightful throne, we're far from happily ever after. The powers that be (the men) that
have run Kamilan in Marwen's absence expect her to yield to their better judgment (they are men after all). Marwen,
however, has other ideas, including keeping her promise to the mother-goddess Jana. The deal is that if Jana answers
Marwen's prayers to return to her homeland, Marwen will revoke the ban of worship and reopen Jana's temple.
Needless to say, this doesn't sit quite right with the patriarchal theological establishment.
Marwen is no slouch at the manly game of politics, however, and is willing to take whatever expedient is necessary to
protect her throne, including entering into marriage to provide an heir. Although the marriage is arranged on her terms,
consistent with the more "open-ended" traditions of Jana, her choice of an ambitious husband proves ill-fated.
Meanwhile, the evil Berend, Held's brother who otherwise had no use for Held when he was alive and king, decides to take
revenge on Kamilan. Berend's overwhelming superiority in forces takes a heavy toll, but, thanks to Marwen's "secret"
lover Shadrack and his unconventional tactics, is ultimately defeated. However, the victory is considered tainted, and
court intrigue seeks to reestablish masculine-defined order.
Along the way, just in case you haven't got it, you have to endure passages like this:
Another problem is that Marwen is a curiously passive character who, despite her intelligence, is much too dependent
on others for her fortune. Where Mary Gentle would have her heroine taking up arms against her enemies and swilling
mead with her allies, Marwen, like any good stay-at-home queen, remains holed up in the castle while her people are
slaughtered for her political convictions (but, then, they're just men playing their silly battle games). Even more
curiously, for a novel that wears its feminist agenda on its sleeve, complete with cover blurb from Ursula K. Le Guin,
it ultimately takes a man, Shadrack, to save queen and country. Even Kiri, the woman who competently performs a
man's job, is primarily a foil, a supporting role in a performance that's kept off center stage.
What's odd is that a novel so critical of enforced gender roles panders to the forms of a genre that profits on it. Here
we have the damsel in distress enraptured by the darkly handsome muscle-bound hunk that graces the cover of every routine
Harlequin romance, the light escapist reading of housewives and domestics everywhere who probably wouldn't know Betty
Friedan from Betty Crocker.
Perhaps Jakober's intent is to employ the conventions of the form to subvert it. Then perhaps I think it would be
much more successful if it weren't so blatantly obvious.
David Soyka is a former journalist and college teacher who writes the occasional short story and freelance article. He makes a living writing corporate marketing communications, which is a kind of fiction without the art. |
|||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide