The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, April 2002 | |||||
A review by David Soyka
Funny that they don't have these kinds of discussions about other kinds of literature. No one seriously questions
why anyone would still be interested in Dickens or Melville because women don't wear hoop skirts and bonnets and
Nantucket sailors don't butcher whales. So if SF wants to stop bitching and moaning about its second-class
literary status, maybe it needs to grow up and stop worrying about the 12-year-olds.
Actually, it already has. Consider the March 2002 issue of Fantasy and Science Fiction
magazine. Not for some chubby, pimply-faced kid who watches too much Discovery Channel. This is for
adults. And for kids who might be trying to figure what that adult world is all about.
It's doubtful if a 12-year-old can really appreciate Maureen F. McHugh's meditation on the effects of
Alzheimer's not only on its victims, but their loved ones. It's one of those investigations into what exactly
is it that defines a human being for which SF is noted. But instead of robots or mutations, McHugh's subject is
the very real horror of a living person whose identity, the very essence of what defines an individual, is
slowly stripped away.
Mila is an engineer. So was her husband, Gus, whose neural connections have deteriorated to the point where
a flower bed seems a perfectly suitable facility for bodily functions normally performed on a toilet. There is
an engineering solution of sorts available, an enzyme treatment that comes with several hitches. It's very
expensive. It's not a permanent defense and the disease could easily recur in a few years. Moreover, while
it restores the neurological connections necessary for human reasoning, it doesn't revive lost memories or
the abilities embedded in them. Gus can be re-engineered to a fully functioning human being, but that human
being won't be the same Gus restored to a state before Alzheimer's took away his personality. It'll be a new
and different Gus. In either case, Gus will never again be the man Mila married. The difference is that while
one is the shell of himself, the other is in a shell that forms a new self.
The 12-year-old might consider this a cool story, but it probably won't resonate the way it will with anyone
who has begun to forget where they left the car keys or a long-time acquaintance's name and wonders if this is
a portent of drooling senility. Similarly, Carol Emshwiller's bittersweet depiction of an aging and infirm
super-heroine in "Grandma," though told from the perspective of a child, is not for the comic book set, though
it is for those who have fond memories of that as their main source of literature.
But where less sophisticated readers are really going to get lost is with "Coelacanths." Here Robert Reed
stretches out into Borges territory with a parable of how the spread of the human species throughout the
universe simultaneously changes certain essential notions of humanity while also reaffirming the core of what
it means to be human. As Peter Tillman points out, this theme builds
on the classic James Blish novel, The Seedling Stars. My guess is that the immature reader is going to
get lost trying to figure out just what the hell is going on here. As a somewhat mature reader, myself, I'm not
sure I altogether understand it either. But that's part of the fun. I can say the same thing about James
Patrick Keely's "The Pyramid of Amirah," which ponders the concept of religious revelation and sacrifice. I think.
With that in mind, it's interesting that Michelle West in her regular book review focuses on novels aimed at young
adults as a personal reaction to the September 11 attacks because:
David Soyka is a former journalist and college teacher who writes the occasional short story and freelance article. He makes a living writing corporate marketing communications, which is a kind of fiction without the art. |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide