| Interzone, February 2001 | |||||
| A review by David Soyka
Having said that, I have no idea what that is supposed to mean -- I mean,
what exactly is the "British scene"? Other than
that they share curious spelling habits as putting an unnecessary "u" in "colour"? Indeed, this issue's range of divergent
styles makes lumping authors together merely because of national origin seem a bit silly.
If Richard Calder is not as immediately recognized in the colonies as Stephen Baxter (or Paul J. McAuley, often mentioned in
the same breath with Baxter, who writes an interesting book review column here), both of whom are featured in this issue, it
is because he lacks, incredibly, an American publisher. The cause of this may be because the novels that have appeared here,
the Dead trilogy and Cytheria, are not exactly beach reading. Calder's work is highly atmospheric, as his lead
contribution, "The Nephilim," illustrates. It's also often graphically violent (though not so much in this tale), and sexually
weird (as a character's copulation with a sphinx certainly qualifies).
This bleak fable is a polemic about the conflict between rationality and
spirituality in confronting the forces of darkness, represented as magical
creatures emerging from the Netherworld to disrupt a deteriorating 56th-century English aristocracy. That both
sides are, in their own ways, corrupt, and contributing factors to the dilemma, renders a rather dank outlook for
even well-meant intentions.
Considerably more well-known here, Baxter couldn't be more stylistically different. In addition to his short story,
"Lost Continent," you can get an idea of the breadth of Baxter's work in his interview with Nick Gevers, which elicits
some insightful commentary concerning the range of the Baxterium oeuvre. Baxter's brand of SF is the hard variety,
though he himself disdains the term as "amorphous," in which even "far out" concepts must be rooted, however slightly,
in some sort of legitimate scientific principle, the sometimes pedantic explication of which forms the core of the
narrative. "Lost Continent" is a pretty good example of that, being a conversation between two old university chums in yet
another variation of the "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean I'm crazy" theme. What makes this perhaps a bit more
intriguing is Baxter's accompanying interview remark that his concluding Manifold trilogy novel will
deal with a "paranoid explanation" of the universe -- so perhaps this short tale may be the genesis of that upcoming
work. Baxter's take on Philip K. Dick, however, involves such details as:
Someone who could care less about scientific plausibility, except perhaps in the most incidental way, is Ruaridh Pringle in
his first published story, "Surfers." We're in Rudy Rucker on drugs territory here, and although the fantastical imagery
Pringle employs sometimes threatens to get overdone a bit (I found myself skimming some points of narrative), it's a funny
piece.
Not so funny, with an image that's disturbingly dead-on, is "The Eaters" by
Alexander Glass, in which a restaurant serves its fare upon an anonymous
naked person. I don't know if Glass is familiar with the anecdote about
Frank Sinatra slurping a bacon and eggs breakfast off a prostitute's
stomach, but he transforms this sexually charged notion into a highly
effective transcendental allegory.
Stephen Dedman's "Ravens" is more in line with the Baxter school, though he doesn't spend a lot of time attempting to
build plausibility. And while maybe it's not unlikely that police would some day be dispatched to prevent possible
suicides based on computer generated probability statistics, it's really not the focus of the story. It's the choices we
make, and the compromises that go with them, in working for what's best in society, that are typically neither purely
altruistic nor entirely comfortable to live with. Interestingly, Dedman, who is from former British penal colony
Australia (which has its own clique of SF writers) sets the story in Los Angeles. I wonder if he's saying
anything in particular about the American brand of social conformity?
Something that, to my mind at least, exemplifies a British attitude wasn't in the fiction, but in the reviews. Nick
Lowe's always amusing "Mutant Popcorn" movie column savages both Red Planet and The Grinch with a biting wit that popular
American critics often lack. And the way Chris Gilmore damns with faint praise in his "Perils and Lampoons"
book column shows how the proverbial British stiff upper lip can snarl in a polite fashion.
David Soyka is a former journalist and college teacher who writes the occasional short story and freelance article. He makes a living writing corporate marketing communications, which is a kind of fiction without the art. |
|||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide