Ink | ||||||||
Hal Duncan | ||||||||
Del Rey, 530 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by Paul Kincaid
Fortunately Hal Duncan is too brash and arrogant a writer to tie himself down so lightly.
Ink, the sequel to Vellum and the concluding part of The Book of All Hours, is a mess,
a sprawling, swaggering, aggressive mess. It is also one of the most ambitious books you're likely to encounter this
year. And it comes as close to making sense of its predecessor as even the most optimistic of us might have hoped.
The titles of the two volumes are suggestive. If Vellum laid out the pages of myth and story and the multiverse,
Ink is about what is inscribed upon those pages. Or rather, how the various players in the game attempt to inscribe
their own mark upon the Vellum. More precisely, it is a book that moves from chaos towards order.
Vellum swept us up in a shape-shifting confusion of characters who were not characters but archetypes, roles not
people. Ink continues with the shape-shifting, but now the roles are becoming more clearly defined and the focus of
the work is narrowing down upon a small theatrical cast. In the first half of the book that is precisely what they are,
a small group of travelling players performing a souped-up version of The Bacchae by Euripedes in a pseudo-medieval
fold of the vellum. Meanwhile, swirling around this core the same archetypes are acting out different versions of the
same drama in a variety of fascistic, blood-soaked avatars of the twentieth century.
We can see them more clearly now. Don MacChuill who is also Don Coyote, a name which neatly enfolds Cervantes' knight and the
trickster god, is both a foul-mouthed Scot and the distanced commentator on the scene. Guy Fox (a reference more to V for
Vendetta than to Guido Fawkes?) is also Reynard or Reinhardt, the plotter, the writer. Thomas Messenger, Tamuz or Puck, is
both the knowing object of homosexual desire and the perennial sacrifice. But the two who most occupy centre stage are Joey
Pechorin, Joey Narcosis, the Judas figure driven to betrayal by desire and impatience; and Jack Carter, Jack Flash, Springheeled
Jack, also Iacchus or Bacchus, the wild hero and also the lord of misrule.
It is a very masculine company very given to violence. Duncan has a gleeful way of describing mayhem and murder. Any minor figure
outside the sacred circle, indeed any casual passer-by, is virtually doomed to a messy death. But he's an even-handed writer:
his central figures suffer equally, indeed at one time or another virtually all of them are subjected to graphic torture or
callous cruelty. And since, within this multiverse, they are the equivalent of immortals, he does not have to worry too much
about their survival, they will simply reappear whole in some other fold, or the scene will be re-shot with a different
ending. One of the abiding themes of the book is an abhorrence of war and its consequences, but it is difficult to square
this with Duncan's obsessive, almost pornographic interest in the minutiae of pain and injury.
In such a male milieu, it is unsurprising that manifestations of sexual desire and satisfaction are entirely homosexual. Yet,
until the end, homosexuality is invariably linked with shame, self-disgust and usually death. It is as if Duncan is edging
around something that is both attractive and discomforting at the same time. Certainly there is no comfort, no nurturing
anywhere in this world. Those, of course, are attributes traditionally associated with the female figure in the myths and
stories that Duncan has twisted and entwined into this narrative. And there is a woman in the sacred circle, Phreedom, also
known as Anna or Anat, who is at various times described as sister or mother of one of the other archetypes though she
does not do much to fulfil these roles. Significantly, it is only in the epilogue that she takes on the third role traditionally
assigned to women, that of wife, so it is only in these last few pages that there is any sense of comfort and nurturing in
the book. But Phreedom is absent from the first half of this volume, except as a passive observer (there are suggestions
along the way that the five are searching for their lost companion, but such a quest is hardly a driving force in the
narrative). When she does emerge into the action, it is with as much violence and bloodshed as any of her male colleagues,
and this gender-neutral role remains her lot throughout most of the rest of the book.
In this first part of the book the characters are more cohesive as a group, have more of a sense of purpose, than they did
in Vellum, but they are still adrift in the multiverse, at the mercy of forces beyond their knowledge or control. That
changes in the second part. Here the six have become a sort of trans-temporal A-Team, heading out on missions to identifiable
and accessible points in the multiverse, assuming their archetypal roles as if in an episode of Mission: Impossible. Now they
know the forces ranged against them, can find their way through the Vellum, and have a clear goal in mind. They are out to
find the last edition of The Book of All Hours.
The quest takes them to a version of Palestine in 1929, and what happens here will form the spine of this half of the book. War
hero Jack Carter arrives on a quest to find his old professor, Samuel Hobbsbaum (an avatar of Seamus Finnan, the absent seventh
member of the group and the one who inevitably is the key to it all). There he joins forces with a mysterious Prussian Baron,
Reinhardt, a sexually promiscuous local boy called Tamuz, a violent Scot, MacChuill, and the surprising leader of a local
tribe, Anat. Opposing them is the shadowy Russian, Pechorin. Stories and plays recur throughout the two novels as our way of
constructing and understanding and shaping our world:
the play the troupe performs in the first half of this novel, the radio broadcasts of Don Coyote throughout the book,
and so on. Here the conflict is reproduced in passages from a host of different books, including a cowboy novel by Joe
Campbell, a thriller by R. Graves and of course, inevitably and recursively, Ink by Hal Duncan.
So we come back to that initial dread: it is indeed a novel about story. But story, not writing. The writers in this book,
attempting to forge or revise The Book of All Hours, fail, causing more mayhem than they were trying to
correct. But story wins; recasting the Bible to undermine our most comforting myths, and presenting the twentieth century
as a blood-soaked echo of myths that go back before the earliest civilisations, story becomes not just the way we apprehend
the world but the way we can finally throw off the yoke of the future and forge a world not doomed by its past. It is a
daring concept, grandiose, florid, messy; and Ink comes nowhere near achieving its ambition. Oh but the ambition
is grand; would that other writers might aim so high and fail so spectacularly.
Paul Kincaid is the recipient of the SFRA's Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service for 2006. He is the co-editor of The Arthur C. Clarke Award: A Critical Anthology. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide