Arthurian Sites in the West | ||||||||
C.A. Ralegh Radford & Michael J. Swanton | ||||||||
University of Exeter Press, 87 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by Georges T. Dodds
First of all, this is no tourist guide to Arthurian sites, but rather an outline of hard fact vs. legend regarding a number of alleged Arthurian
sites. It begins by outlining what sort of civilisation existed in western England in the early post-Roman era: what sort of sea commerce went
on, what sort of religious and lay communities existed, what sort of raiders and invaders were about.
Chapter 2 discusses the hilltop fortress at South Cadbury, Somerset, a site occupied since Neolithic times and associated with Camelot. The
buried structures discovered there in 1966-1970 digs give some credence that a significant population once inhabited this fortress-city
site. Artists' recreations of the buildings thought to have stood there in early post-Roman times are presented. In Chapter 3, Arthur's
alleged birthplace of Tintagel, a much eroded promontory surrounded by cliffs is discussed. The layout of buildings in different eras,
its religious community and people are discussed. In Chapter 4, Glastonbury, near where Arthur is allegedly buried, is discussed. The
possibly politically convenient "discovery" and exhumation of the alleged remains of Arthur and Guinevere and a nearby lead
cross (now lost) inscribed with "Here lies the renowned King Arthur, with Guinevere his second wife, in the island of Avalon" is
discussed. The authors also bring up the fact that the sea levels in Arthur's time were much higher and would have made of Glastonbury,
at least at certain times of the year, a near island: like the mythical Avalon. The last chapter deals with the portion of Arthurian
mythology told in the romance of Tristan and Iseult, including King Mark, the latter's uncle. Castle Dore, similar but smaller
than the fortress at South Cadbury would have been consistent with a fortified hilltop of the fifth to seventh century. Nearby is a sixth
century burial stone -- the Tristan stone -- bearing the inscription "DRUSTANUS HIC IACIT/CUNOMORI FILIUS, which with some linguistic
massage can be interpreted as "Here lies Tristan son of Mark" -- a remarkable coincidence.
What this fascinating book basically shows, is that there are many tantalizing hints out there, but little hard evidence for a flesh
and blood Arthur. Arthurian Sites in the West includes a number of maps and site plans, and an extensive bibliography, but
thankfully has steered away from having footnotes throughout the main text, and from delving into the minutiae of every artefact or
document. It is a clearly written, informative document, and certainly something the reader of Arthurian mythology should not be
without. Other books about the historical Arthur, such as Geoffrey Ashe's The Quest for Arthur's Britain (1968) take a
somewhat less rigorous approach to the evidence and may appeal more to those who take a more mystical/mythological approach to their
Arthurian lore, but for those wishing truth over rumour, Arthurian Sites in the West is a good start.
Georges Dodds is a research scientist in vegetable crop physiology, who for close to 25 years has read and collected close to 2000 titles of predominantly pre-1950 science-fiction and fantasy, both in English and French. He writes columns on early imaginative literature for WARP, the newsletter/fanzine of the Montreal Science Fiction and Fantasy Association and maintains a site reflecting his tastes in imaginative literature. |
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide