| Sky Coyote | |||||||||||||||
| Kage Baker | |||||||||||||||
| Harcourt Brace, 310 pages | |||||||||||||||
|
A review by David Soyka
Except for a few nuances, you'd have no trouble following Sky Coyote without having read
the first Company novel, the widely and deservedly acclaimed
In the Garden of Iden. That book was a 1998 Top 10 SF and Fantasy selection by
Amazon.com and a runner-up for the Barnes and Noble "New Voices" award; Baker herself is
a 1998 John W. Campbell Best New Writer finalist. Skipping ahead to Sky Coyote,
however, might make you wonder what all the fuss is about.
Sky Coyote fails to hold up to its predecessor in part for all the reasons that
second books in a series typically prove less than satisfying. Although there is a
story of sorts, its primary purpose is to further develop characters and situations
that introduce ideas important to whatever will happen in the next volume and, consequently,
a number of threads remain unresolved. A more serious flaw for this particular series,
however, is that Baker forsakes the delicate balance between farce and tragedy she successfully
struck in her first novel for heavier handed satire that thuds more than it amuses or enlightens.
Part of the problem arises from a shift in first person narrator from one book to the
next. In the Garden of Iden is Mendoza's reminiscence of how she came to become
an Immortal and her subsequent ill-fated love affair with a religious dissident in 16th century England.
You can easily empathize with Mendoza's tale about her loss of innocence, even while
knowing that all along things will eventually end up badly. Sort of like how every time
you see Hamlet there's a vague hope that this time around the melancholy Dane will somehow
or another manage to avoid the poisoned sword tip, despite the certainty he won't.
Sky Coyote, in contrast, is related by Mendoza's mentor, Joseph, and is thus
laden with a cynicism that, while in keeping with a being who has not only witnessed but
collaborated in acts of human stupidity and cruelty over the course of several centuries,
ultimately becomes wearisome. Even for a cynical kind of guy like me.
Joseph is presented literally and figuratively as a fallen god -- prosthetically-enhanced
to look like the Sky Coyote god worshipped by the Chumash of Humanshup Indian tribe in
17th century California. His assignment is to gain Chumash acquiescence to be transported
in "sky canoes" to live with the "Sky People" in a Company-controlled sanctuary, thus saving
the tribe from the imminent destructive arrival of the Spanish Conquistadors. Of course,
despite Company propaganda that its interests are purely altruistic in preserving the culture
of an indigenous people from the upcoming clash with Europeans, there is a profit
motivation. Moreover, exposing the Chumash to the presence of people from the future is
also a contamination of their culture, albeit a more benevolent one. But for some reason
Baker depicts this adoption of the Chumash by the Company as a mutually beneficial fit.
And here's where the premise starts to fall apart for me. In the Garden of Iden
was widely praised for accurately evoking the times of England during the destructive
reign of Queen Mary and her supporters in attempting to reestablish Catholicism as the
state religion. Now, whether a work of fiction adheres to historical fact is,
in terms of artistic merit, in and of itself irrelevant. (Witness the cheap shots some
critics have taken at the movies Elizabeth and Shakespeare in Love for their anachronisms
and inaccurate retelling of historical events, as if the Bard himself was ever overly
concerned about authenticity in penning his own histories because, after all, 'tis the
play that's the thing.) So if Baker wants to depart from a realistic depiction of the
times her characters visit, that's fine as long as the overriding artistic purpose is
served. But for the life of me, I don't get the point of why Baker has the Chumash
(who happen to be a real tribe, by the way) speak in 20th century slang:
It seems to me that the story is really just a background to drop some hints that all may not
be well in the 24th century for mortals. Or for those Immortals who have begun to question
their assignments from imperfect -- and quite possibly severely neurotic-humans. The mortals
who control the Company (if indeed they actually control it) are depicted as fairly pathetic
creatures, afraid of the cyborgs that supposedly serve them. What happens once the intellectually
and physically superior Immortals eventually live to meet their masters in the 24th
Century -- who will be serving whom? Or, to prevent this possibility, perhaps the Immortals
will not be allowed to co-exist with their creators?
But those sorts of questions are for subsequent installments. At the conclusion of
Sky Coyote, Joseph says in passing that the Company has assigned him to work in the
entertainment industry of early 20th Century Hollywood. He has lost track of Mendoza, although
he thinks he might have run into her in 1923 with someone who "couldn't possibly have been...
the person I thought I saw there."
Which brings us to the third volume in the Company series,
Mendoza in Hollywood, due sometime next year. According to Kage Baker's web site, the story begins:
That said, despite my reservations about Sky Coyote, I for one am looking forward to see
where Baker is going with this. And to see if that man who re-enters Mendoza's life is who I think he is.
"Son Observe the Time"
On the eve of the Great San Francisco Earthquake in 1906, the Immortal narrator Victor heads
Company operations to appropriate hoards before the rubble falls that will be presumed destroyed
until their "discovery" in the 24th century. Victor is also responsible for "rescuing" Donal,
the child of poor but hardworking Irish immigrants, who has the mental and physical propensities
required to be converted into a cyborg like himself indentured to Company's future salvage
operations down through the remaining centuries.
Victor is somewhat pompous, having adopted the privileged airs that go with his cover identity
of a proper upper-class gentleman, although it becomes evident that even among Immortals there
are class distinctions determined by intellectual aptitudes and job roles. Moreover, despite
their immortality (Victor survives a throat-cutting thanks to self-repairing agents in his
bloodstream and skin), apparently his ilk can still be frightened about events they can foresee,
but not fully control. Indeed, Victor comes to a revelation about himself that questions whether
he has any control over his own actions.
But what is primarily of interest is Victor's relationship with humans. He befriends Donal's
father by pretending to be an Irish laborer who is having a wee bit of a problem with
drink. The father befriends Victor and offers him the hospitality of his own family and modest
home. This is according to plan, of course, to provide Victor the opportunity to confirm Donal's
suitability as a cyborg and to gain the boy's trust to ensure that his abduction right before
the earthquake hits goes off smoothly (which, thanks to another unforeseen intervention, it
doesn't). Victor is sufficiently sympathetic towards the family to buy tickets for them to attend
a children's play Donal's sister wants to see, but which the family is otherwise too poor to
afford. At the same time, Victor makes no effort to save them from what he knows is certain
death the following night, Donal being the only family member that qualifies for
salvation. That's just the way it works.
Of course, the cognitive dissonance of the immortal Victor provides dead-eye insight into
one of the many contradictions of human behavior. Perhaps the most recent example is the
American aviators who, after kissing their loved ones asleep, take off from Midwestern airfields
to inflict collateral damage on innocent people in their Belgrade bombing runs and then return
to their regular suburban routine. Like Victor, they are just doing their jobs.
Whether Victor will continue to feel this way depends on whether Baker decides to continue
the thread of this character in future Company stories. For now, what's important is how we
readers feel about his -- and, by implication, our -- complacent acquiescence regarding such matters.
David Soyka is a former journalist and college teacher who writes the occasional short story and freelance article. He makes a living writing corporate marketing communications, which is a kind of fiction without the art. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide