| The Caves of Steel | ||||||||
| Isaac Asimov | ||||||||
| Narrated by William Dufris, unabridged | ||||||||
| Tantor Media, 7 hours 44 minutes | ||||||||
|
A review by Nicki Gerlach
Elijah Baley is a regular police detective, content in his work and his life until the day his boss assigns him the most delicate
and dangerous case of his career. A Spacer scientist has been murdered by an Earthman, and Baley is responsible for finding the
culprit and avoiding increased tension between the City and Spacetown. But, of course, he's not going to be allowed to work
alone. He has been assigned a partner from Spacetown, R. Daneel Olivaw… and the R. stands for robot. Olivaw is unlike anything
Baley's ever seen, a robot designed to exactly mimic human appearance; and in Olivaw's case, the appearance he is mimicking is
that of the murder victim. Baley must overcome his anti-robot prejudices and learn to work with Olivaw in order to solve the
murder, and, what's more, uncover the real reason for the underlying tension between the Spacers and the Earthmen.
There is a very fine line for an author to walk when setting their science fiction novel in Earth's future… Not far enough in
the future, and they run the risk of the future catching up to the book (vis. 1984 and 2001) without catching up to the
technology, making it simultaneously dated and implausible. On the other hand, setting the book too far in the future runs the
opposite risk of having technology catch up to the book, without catching up to the future. Both of these problems are
particularly evident in classic sci-fi -- more time since publication equals more time for either the predicted technology or
timeline to be proven wrong.
That said, The Caves of Steel actually fares pretty well against the dilemma of future timing. While I think Asimov
over-shot when he set it a thousand years in the future -- no one in 1008 C.E. could have predicted the internet, and I similarly
think 3008 is going to be different from 2008 by a matter of substance, not degree -- a lot of the issues that get raised are
oddly prescient of problems facing today's world. Sure, the predicted "eight billion people on Earth oh my god we all have to
live in shoeboxes and shower communally and eat yeast" seems a trifle hyperdramatic, given that we're currently pushing seven
billion, but from the viewpoint of a 2.5-billion-global-population-1950s, eight billion probably seemed like a sufficiently
scary big number. (Even more scary is that Asimov thought it would take us a thousand years to get to eight billion, and we're
probably going to manage to do it in 75.) However, Asimov's proposed solution to over-population -- increased galactic
colonization -- is impractical by today's lights, not just because we lack the technology, but because it's at best a
stop-gap: eventually those worlds are going to become over-populated as well. Still, I think the rather grim picture that
Asimov paints of an overcrowded Earth is potent enough to shock people into thinking about overpopulation, and that's all to the good.
Apart from the deeper cultural and philosophical issues raised by this book, the plot was interesting enough to keep me
engaged. While murder mysteries aren't usually my genre of choice, I had a gut instinct as to the guilty party from relatively
early on in the book, and although I couldn't quite piece together the evidence by myself, it certainly made sense with no
glaring holes when the characters explained it during the denouement. In retrospect, the pacing of the story is a little
strange, with long chunks of philosophical discussion about the nature of roboticity, humanity, citification, colonization,
etc. interspersed with more typical detective work and action-oriented sequences, although both types of sections were done
well enough to hold my attention without dragging.
One issue I did have with this book was the handling of the female characters. Even making allowances for the time and cultural
change that has occurred since this novel's original publication, the women in this book (not that there were many) just plain
annoyed me. Part of this was the narrator's responsibility – his voices for women were forced and could get rather
shrill -- but part of this is surely because the women in the novel are essentially shells, good for little except clinging
to their husbands in fright and gossiping in the bathrooms. It wasn't egregious enough to ruin my enjoyment of the book, and
the women get relatively little "screen time," so periods of annoyance were brief, but grating nevertheless. Dufris did
a fine job with the rest of the narration; characters were distinguishable by voice, especially after the first chapter,
and the acting injected the right level of personality and emotion without getting overdramatic or yelly.
Overall, I think The Caves of Steel would be a good first exposure for the uninitiated to Asimov's work or to
classic science fiction in general, and the audio version would be an enjoyable way to revisit the book for those
who are already fans.
Nicki Gerlach is a mad scientist by day and an avid reader the rest of the time. More of her book reviews can be found at her blog, fyreflybooks.wordpress.com/. |
|||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide