| Star Wars: The Phantom Menace | ||
| written and directed by George Lucas | ||
| 131 minutes | ||
|
Rick Norwood
In The Phantom Menace you will see wonders you have never seen before.
The original Star Wars forever raised our expectations where special effects are
concerned. After seeing The Phantom Menace you will have some idea, for the first time, what
special effects will be like in the 21st Century. The film is beautiful. The undersea city,
not hinted at in the previews or publicity stills, is a marvelous conception. But to that is added,
even in the interior views, fish swimming in both the foreground and the background, giving a
sense of three dimensional reality to wonderland. This same depth of field is used to great
advantage as a huge spaceship lands on a forest planet. We see its shadow on the trees below,
and, far in the distance, a flock of birds, disturbed by its passage, takes flight. I could rave for a
long time: the planet-spanning city at sunset, the slave quarters on Tatooine at night -- but you will
see all this for yourself, unless the invidious reviews talk you out of seeing this treat of a movie.
The syndicated movie review in my local newspaper gave The Phantom Menace two
stars. In other words, the reviewer, after seeing the film, is telling his readers that The Phantom
Menace is no more entertaining than, to pick a couple of two star movies at random, Cop Land or
The First Wives Club. Two stars suggests ordinary, run of the mill, nothing special. But even if
the reviewer honestly hated The Phantom Menace, he knows that it is not an ordinary film. Why,
then, are bad reviews of this marvelous science fantasy the rule rather than the exception.
Many reviewers complain about the hype, the marketing, as if that were somehow relevant
to enjoyment of the movie. I have never bought a Phantom Menace toy, and probably never will.
Does that qualify me to enjoy the movie for itself?
But I think what is really going on is that film reviewers are mostly old. My desk reference
to films gives the 1939 Gunga Din four stars, its highest rating. Every fault that critics find in The
Phantom Menace is found ten times over in Gunga Din. It is all action. The characterization,
what there is of it, is sentimental, the plot unbelievable. And, even though I am a fan of period
film, I find Gunga Din creaky and slow. My kids find it unwatchable.
The achievement of George Lucas in The Phantom Menace is to deliver information, both
visual and verbal, with a speed and clarity that keeps kids raised on the art form of video games
from being bored. Critics, most of whom look down on video games the way my parents looked
down on science fiction, just can't take it in.
One critic complained that the cuts are too fast, another that there is no human interest.
There is plenty of human interest, but you've got to be paying attention. I'll mention two great
moments, each lasting only a few seconds.
Ani is told by Qui-Gon Jinn to hide until the fighting is over and it is safe to come out, but
Ani, naturally, hides in the cockpit of a star fighter. He starts the ship to take out some robots
about to kill Queen Amindala, and on auto-pilot, the ship takes off. Soon Ani finds himself in the
middle of a space battle. As he prepares to take control of the ship and join the fray, he explains to
R2D2, "Qui-Gon told me to stay in the cockpit."
Another special moment. Qui-Gon is fighting Darth Maul. A force screen separates them
briefly. Darth Maul glares through the screen at Qui-Gon. And Qui-Gon kneels, turns off his light
saber, and uses the few seconds to rest, to center himself, to find calm.
Most action movies have very little plot, the stretches between one set piece and another
are dull, and the various car, train, and helicopter chases have very little to do with what is
happening. For example, if you took the car chase from The Rock, and the boat chase from
Face/Off, and exchanged them, neither movie would be one whit different.
In The Phantom Menace, as in all the Star Wars films, every moment has the look and feel
of Star Wars. You could not put one frame into another film without attracting attention, nor could
you put one frame of another film into Star Wars without it standing out like a sore thumb. George
Lucas has given us a great gift, and deserves better than the carping of small minded critics. I love
movies. But often I have rented a film on the four star recommendation of a reviewer only to find
that it is slow paced, in black and white, about ordinary characters to whom nothing happens.
Ah, well. I need to rest, center myself, find calm. Don't let the critics get you down,
George.
Is The Phantom Empire perfect? Of course not. I would have preferred a more realistic
look to some of the aliens, who appear to have been born in a Warner Brother's cartoon. And I
don't find the deliberate scientific blunders amusing. Not once, but several times, the characters
say that a submarine is going to take them through the core of the planet.
But these are minor quibbles. I saw The Phantom Menace opening day (and I didn't wait
in line). I loved it. I saw it again the next day and enjoyed it even more the second time around.
At the climax of the film, George Lucas does something I would have thought impossible.
A common device of action films is to cut back and forth between two plot threads, occurring in
different places at the same time. In The Phantom Menace there are four plot threads. The
intercutting among them is rapid, and yet every moment is crystal clear, and the action is original:
amusing, exciting, and moving by turns.
George Lucas, thank you, for the most fun I've had at the movies so far this year.
Rick Norwood is a mathematician and writer whose small press publishing house, Manuscript Press, has published books by Hal Clement, R.A. Lafferty, and Hal Foster. He is also the editor of Comics Revue Monthly, which publishes such classic comic strips as Flash Gordon, Sky Masters, Modesty Blaise, Tarzan, Odd Bodkins, Casey Ruggles, The Phantom, Gasoline Alley, Krazy Kat, Alley Oop, Little Orphan Annie, Barnaby, Buz Sawyer, and Steve Canyon. |
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide