| A Galaxy in a Jar: Selected Poetry | ||||||||
| Laurel Winter | ||||||||
| Dark Regions Press, 56 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by Chris Przybyszewski
If you are going to read A Galaxy in a Jar, and I suggest that everyone does, do not read the poem
titled "e-Love." At least, don't randomly flip to that poem first, like I did.
Here's why: "I will pass myself into the body of the message /," the poem's voice announces. "[B]ecause your ISP does not
allow attachments / Your firewall did not stop me; / your virus detection software did not flutter / because now I am installed /
in your heart / and you cannot delete me."
Wow. That's bad stuff. Really bad. I mention that poem here as the first example of this review because the preceding poem
is totally not representative of the rest of this book. Instead, the collection presented in A Galaxy in a Jar
is positively impish, much as the being who is featured in "Godlet," a poem that contains the book's title
line:
The wink toward conventional religion, spiritualism, creationism, and the very nature of god is done in a playful manner, one
that is harmless but that -- at the same time -- intrigues the reader with its implications.
Winter offers another theory on the nature of the deities in "myth." In this poem, "and the goddess [your name here]/ of [what
you need most]/ grants her own wish."
Despite the simplicity and brevity of this piece, Winter gives two fairly straightforward views: the full power of the cosmos
is there for the taking. Secondly, that power is for those people who are goddesses. What's good about this poem is that the
use of brackets both define its form and also free up the implications. On the one hand, it's a standard form one could find
in a doctor's office. On the other hand, its generality allows anyone to apply.
A goddess is, after all, not a human. Therefore, it stands to reason that the mortal form of male and female is no
hindrance. In addition, this special godhood is not born out of desire or greed. It's born out of need, dire need. That's a
lot of world view in an economy of language.
Both of these poems play straight into the theme of the overall book, which is that there is magic in the mundane. Whereas
many do not see marvels in an egg, a pocket, a pair of mittens, or brushing one's teeth (among the various other themes of
the poems), Winter reminds us that there are unexplored worlds in these places and wonders to be explored. She seems to be
telling us to stop and think about what is happening, put some brain power into what we could do, into how much power we
have over so many things.
What I like about both of the latter poems is exactly what I do not like about the first example. Poetry is not just pretty
words on a page. Poetry is, instead, a powerful medium of expressing ideas. Poetry can move ideas in a way unavailable to
prose, to painting, to music, or to other forms of art. Each of those forms have their own means of expression and each of
those forms are independently important and their abilities are likewise unavailable to poetry. The interconnection between
linguistic beauty and meaning is poetry's private domain. To pay attention to the one and to ignore the other is to create
a bad poem (e.g. "e-Love").
Some of you out there might want to tell me about the meaning of "e-Love." I don't want to hear about it. Seriously. Don't
bother. Instead, let's talk instead about galaxies and jars and the worlds between them. That would be much more worth our time.
Chris learned to read from books of fantasy and science fiction, in that order. And any time he can find a graphic novel that inspires, that's good too. |
|||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide