| Welcome to the Greenhouse: New Science Fiction on Climate Change | ||||||||
| edited by Gordon Van Gelder | ||||||||
| OR Books, 352 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by Paul Kincaid
I am coming to the conclusion that the worst disservice ever done to "science fiction" was saddling it with that
name. In particular, the "science" part. It raises expectations and assumptions on behalf of both readers and
writers that the genre mostly cannot, and should not, even attempt to fulfil. I have doubts about
Robert A. Heinlein's alternative, "speculative fiction," but really, I can see where he's coming from.
As long as we expect fiction to incorporate scientific rigor, we are doomed to disappointment. And if we
expect science fiction writers to be better qualified than any other reasonably well-informed member of the
public to comment on the scientific issues facing us today, we are deceiving ourselves. The ability to play
with ideas does not predicate any understanding of what underlies those ideas; still less does it imply
any real life ability to do anything meaningful with those ideas. Science fiction does not predict
anything, it does not lay out guidelines for how faster than light travel might be facilitated or how
encounters with aliens should be negotiated. Yet we never quite shake off the notion that science fiction
is, by its very nature, somehow more true, more useful, more accurate than other fictions.
That self-delusion, in which we have all colluded at some point and to some degree, is evident in the subtitle
of this new collection: "New science fiction on climate change." Note that "on" -- we can all rest easy because
science fiction is now addressing the issue. It is there in the preface by environmental journalist Elizabeth
Kolbert, when she talks about what we don't know about global warming:
Take, for example, "True North" by M.J. Locke, which is, I think, one of the better stories in this
collection. It is set in Montana a little under a hundred years from now, a harsh and unforgiving landscape,
where a lonely widower helps a group of children. Along the way they encounter a militaristic enclave and a
secret scientific hideaway. Well, the militaristic enclave is familiar from any number of survivalist tales
or dystopias, while the secret scientific hideaway is nothing more than Asimov's Foundation relocated a
little closer in time and space. It's a neat story, fairly predictable in its structure but it has a nice
tough guy tone and efficient characterisation; but what does it actually tell us about climate
change? Montana's a fairly rugged landscape anyway, but whether it would be affected this way is, as
Kolbert points out, one of the things science cannot tell us, and neither can science fiction. What we
have here is the old Western myth: a tough land breeds tough people, but with a leavening of sentiment,
because the tough guy has to look after the children. That a hero can defeat an army virtually
single-handed, and that there is going to be a secret place where scientists will work to put everything
right again, is just wishful thinking. So a hard-edged story with an aura of realism about it turns out to
be telling us that after climate change myths will come true.
Though to be honest that's a far more realistic take on things than some of the stories included
here. "Damned When You Do" by Jeff Carlson has a holy child able to change the rate of the world's spin just
by walking around the equator, until common humanity knocks him off course. Frankly, if that's the most likely
solution to global warming that our science fiction writers can come up with, we're doomed. Or maybe the
solution is to contact aliens, as in "Not A Problem" by Matthew Hughes. This isn't the most reassuring
scenario anyway, particularly not when Hughes's aliens turn out to be dinosaurs who eat us. This is not
addressing climate change, this is not conducting thought experiments about the way the future might be,
this is simply throwing up your hands and retreating into fantasy.
What these stories are doing is using global warming as a background, or even just as an excuse, for a
fairly standard sf story. The genre has been doing post-catastrophe stories for 200 years, so it is very
easy to file off the serial numbers, rename the catastrophe "climate change" and away you go. How many
post-catastrophe stories have you read which effectively extol the virtues of authoritarianism by featuring
strong-willed characters who restore order by taking the law into their own hands and then bending everyone
else to their will?
Here it's called "The California Queen Comes A-Calling" by Pat MacEwan and it features a paddle steamer
sailing about the Inland Sea that is what California has mostly become, bringing frontier justice to
isolated communities. It's a story we've read many times before, in one guise or another, and like so many
American post-catastrophe stories it assumes without question that the mythical "West" will be the model
for American reconstruction.
The 16 authors represented in this volume are pretty much in agreement about what the world will look
like after global warming. The seas will rise and the land will become a desert (the exception is Chris
Lawson in "Sundown," who perversely decides that the earth will freeze over); so the stories follow a
similar course, recounting the new difficulties that must be faced. Other than Carlson and Hughes, the only
contributor who contemplates finding a solution to global warming is Gregory Benford, in what is, to my
mind, the best story in the collection, "Eagle." It approaches its subject obliquely, not directing our
attention to the technology of seeding the clouds, but to the terrorists who want to prevent it for
extreme ecological reasons. It is also the only story in the book about the approach of global warming
rather than its after-effects, and as such in this very contentious area it allows for the fact that
nothing is settled, that everything is open for debate. I suspect that when it comes to the political
confusion that surrounds the science of climate change, I am probably not in the same camp as Benford,
but here he engages with the issue in a far more open fashion than anyone else, and that is what makes
this such an interesting story.
It is interesting that Benford does engage with the issue, because that is far from a given, even in a
narrowly defined theme anthology such as this. You could hardly say that David Prill engages with the
issue in "The Men of Summer," for instance; in the opening lines of the story we are told how hot it
is, and that is practically the only point at which the climate impinges upon the action, which is a
rather slight and surreal story about summer romances gone wild. Reading between the lines of
Ray Vukcevich's "Fish Cakes" we might work out that the rather peculiar mode of travel that occupies
the mid-point of the story is a result of cutting the environmental impact of air travel, but it is
tangential to the story and any impact it might have had is dissipated in a somewhat inconsequential
tale. Meanwhile the giant insects that threaten small town America in "That Creeping Sensation"
by Alan Dean Foster suggest that global warming might play the same part that atomic power once did in
films like Them! without actually addressing climate change in any direct way.
Along with Benford's "Eagle," then, the most interesting stories here are those that keep their attention
close to the onset of global warming. Once it has happened, once the story is all aftermath, then the
scenario becomes a variation on the familiar sf catastrophe story and time and again we see how little
of interest can be wrung from the theme. (The exception that proves this rule is "The Master of the Aviary"
by Bruce Sterling, which comes close to the Benford as one of the best stories in the collection. But this
is set so far after the event that we have gone well beyond survival mode and an elaborate social system
has become established; and Sterling's story is far more about this Renaissance-like society than it is
about climate change.) Keeping close to when global warming is actually happening, keeping the focus
tight, allows a more open ending. In "Turtle Love," for instance, Joseph Green keeps his attention on the
beachfront communities being lost as sea levels start to rise, but in particular he concentrates on the
effect of rising sea levels on those turtles that lay their eggs in the sand above the high water
line. While in "The Middle of Somewhere," Judith Moffett looks at two disparate women in an isolated
house in the path of a tornado, These are hardly wide-ranging thought experiments about the long-term
social, cultural, political or economic consequences of global warming, but they do speak on the human
level to what some of us might be facing over the coming years. And that is what makes them powerful and
effective stories.
Paul Kincaid is the recipient of the SFRA's Thomas D. Clareson Award for Distinguished Service for 2006. His collection of essays and reviews, What it is we do when we read science fiction is published by Beccon Publications. |
|||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide