The Blade Itself | ||||||||
Joe Abercrombie | ||||||||
Gollancz, 560 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by John Enzinas
Abercrombie, however, takes these conventions and filters them through the lens of Noir (dramas that set their protagonists in
a world perceived as inherently corrupt and unsympathetic). Even though there is not a single character who remains entirely
likeable by the end of the book, every one of them has become a real person whose fate is something you care about -- even if
what you really want is to see them get some sense knocked into them.
The book focuses mostly on the tales of the three main protagonists, each told from their respective perspectives. Each of
these three stories has its own style and they all interweave without fully joining. The first is the cynical intellectual,
Inquisitor Glotka, who works for the secret police of the Union as a torturer. He is an angry bitter man, having lost his
golden-boy status when he was captured and tortured himself in the Union's last war and was left a disfigured cripple. Glotka
is put at odds with the Nobleman, Jezal den Luthar. Jezal is society's latest golden boy, with no plans for his future other
than a cushy government post and all the wine, women and gambling he can stand. The third of the main characters is the
barbarian Logen Ninefingers, who agrees to join the magus on his quest, partly as penance for past misdeeds and partly out
of curiosity.
Unlike much of the fantasy I have read, Abercrombie keeps his focus tight on each of his characters. Logen cares mostly
about keeping himself and his charges alive. He is able to watch much of the planning of the magus, but for the most part
does not care. His battle cry is "I'm still alive." Glotka is probably the most politically active of the three. He becomes
enmeshed in political machinations for control of the Union, but while he understands his role he cares more about
maintaining his own position (and life) as well as complaining about his lost status. Jezal has no real concern for the
world around him. Even the talk of the upcoming war only fuels his fantasies for promotion. He alternates between lamenting
the hard work he must do to become a good enough fencer to win the regimental challenge and pining like a lovesick puppy
over his friend's sister.
The only criticism I have is the utter lack of female characters with any sort of agenda of their own. Abercrombie can
surely write female characters, as is aptly demonstrated by Ardee. Her dialogue and personality are crisp and clean. However,
she, (like the only other female in the book with an actual
part) exists only as a means of motivating the main (male) characters. Ardee is given no real motivation of her own, but
seems rather to exist merely as a plot device. I hope this will change in future books.
In addition to excellent characterizations and fascinating world-building, Abercrombie also writes the best fight scenes
I have read in ages. I'm glad the whole package is good, but I could happily recommend The Blade Itself for the fight scenes alone.
John Enzinas reads frequently and passionately. In his spare time he plays with swords. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide