| Cyberweb | |||||
| Lisa Mason | |||||
| Avon EOS Books, 262 pages | |||||
| A review by Thomas Myer
Carly Nolan is a former telespace attorney whose license to practice is revoked by her law firm
after she freaks out and delays court proceedings by seven seconds. On top of that,
Data Control, an uber-corporation with meathooks in all parts of society's anatomy,
kicks her out of public telespace.
Carly is forced to live without access to public information or money. She must
live like a rat, stealing sustenance from food recyclers and hijacking what
passes for cash machines in a robot-infested world.
We also meet Pr. Spinner, an AI psychoanalyst (and Carly's nemesis in
Arachne, the predecessor of this novel) that is also on the run from the
law. Spinner's motivations are somewhat murky -- it is the being that first made
contact with the Arachne in Carly's telelink, and although the AI fears
the spider, is drawn to it.
And what is the Arachne? In Lisa Mason's words, it is an archetype -- a
spontaneous de novo creation springing from the primordial mess of the
human meta-program. It is a spider in form because spiders embody two conflicting
ideals: hunter, therefore a destroyer; and builder, therefore a creator.
It seems that the powers-that-be (and there are plenty of them, all tangled
together in their own web of collusion) fear the presence of this vermin, and
want it isolated (at the very least) or outright destroyed.
And, of course, there are other threats: a band of technology-shunning neo-tribal
savages, roaming the streets and sewers of San Francisco, and the Silicon Supremacists,
who want to relegate public telespace to the septic tank of memory.
For all the energy of the plot and the quirkiness of the characters, this novel
contains too many shortcomings in its back-story to keep my total attention.
Readers knowledgeable with current cyberspace technology will be irritated by
this book. Mason's terminology and ideas are either misbegotten or plain
barren. Questions keep popping into my mind: Why mainframes? What happened to
client-server technology? Why do the humans feel threatened by software? I mean,
spiders are pretty freaky, but software can't affect biological life-forms
(unless, of course, the software is aiming a gun at your head).
After the niggling questions comes the realization that some of the larger
pieces don't fit together either. In many scenes, the AI characters outnumber
the humans, and a single huge corporation seems to control salient choke points
in society. However, San Francisco's infrastructure (roads, buildings, bridges,
tunnels) is in such disrepair that you have to wonder about the priorities of
all the technology mongers. Data Control can keep people from entering what
passes for cyberspace, yet there isn't sufficient brainpower, manpower, and
robot power to round up all the neo-luddite freaks and force them to assimilate.
And what about those neo-luddites? How, in a society so ingrained with
gratuitous high-tech, could there exist such a well-established subculture
of illiterate roving savages? This seems like a contemporary bad joke finding
overexcited expression, not a thoughtful commentary, on the dangers of extreme technology.
In my opinion, Gibson's Low-Teks (in "Johnny Mnemonic") are more realistic,
Stephenson's near-future societies are richer and deeper, and Severna Park's
class struggles stick to your ribs better. Lisa Mason fails to extrapolate well,
and in my opinion, this is deadly for a science fiction career.
Thomas Myer is a writer and editor. He works for Cisco Systems, Inc. | |||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2008 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide