| Dr. Bloodmoney | |||||||||||||||
| Philip K. Dick | |||||||||||||||
| Orion Millennium, 304 pages | |||||||||||||||
|
A review by David Soyka
These were the days when the United States was trying to close a missile gap with those pesky Ruskies (a gap which in
fact never existed) with ever-increasing throw-weights that could blow up the world several times over. The emerging
strategic doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction, or MAD (who says the government doesn't have a sense of humor?), sought
to achieve deterrence (though, arguably, it did) by threatening to respond to any nuclear launch by our enemies with
overwhelming strikes guaranteed to wipe us both out.
Talk about your Pyrrhic victory.
Back then people were thinking a lot about what might happen next, assuming that there could even be a "next." The
prospect and consequences of nuclear war permeated the zeitgeist -- ranging from the bleak black and white irony of
Twilight Zone television episodes to awful, poorly dubbed Japanese horror films about nuclear mutants to
the numerous science fiction books that obsessed with nuclear apocalypse. And perhaps no one obsessed better
than Philip K. Dick.
A good example is Dr. Bloodmoney, originally published in 1965 with the subtitle "How We All Got Along After the Bomb,"
recently reissued as volume #32 in the acclaimed SF Masterworks series from the Millennium imprint of Orion Publishing. If
you were alive at that time, it'll serve as a chilling reminder of the underlying and understandable paranoia of the time
(one of Dick's personal obsessions, by the way, exacerbated by heavy drug usage, another fallout of the era). As Dick
himself describes his state of mind in the novel's afterword, which seems to have been written in the
late 70s, "Back in 1964 I was expecting [the end of the world] at any time; I kept checking my watch... such were the fears of the time."
If this is all ancient and perhaps unknown history to you, it's a good place to start a study of an emerging front of writers
who, unlike the atomic ray gun wet dreams of the Golden Agers, sought to depict war, and particularly a nuclear war, as
preposterous horror. Perhaps the most famous of these are Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse 5, Joseph Heller's
Catch-22, Fail-Safe by Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler, and Nevil Shute's
On the Beach. Dr. Bloodmoney should certainly figure somewhere in there as well.
Dr. Bloodmoney is sometimes compared to Dr. Strangelove, director Stanley Kubrick's classic celluloid of nuclear
misanthropy. Though the Germanic protagonists (inspired by the Nazi V-2 rocket scientists whose wartime crimes were overlooked
by the U.S. in compensation for the loan of their ballistic talents) of both works share severe cases of megalomaniacal paranoia,
and the film's subtitle of "How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb" echoes Dick's, they are really quite
different. For one thing, as Dick himself notes, his novel is much more optimistic.
The title character, who is actually referred to by the Germanic "Bluthgeld," is a brilliant scientist who believes himself
a godly incarnation of destruction, capable of bringing down atomic ruin simply by willing it. As is typical with
Dick's handling of the issue of whether just because you're paranoid doesn't mean people aren't out to get you, you can't
be quite sure how crazy Dr. Bluthgeld really is. Dick is masterful at "getting into the head" of the paranoid, depicting how
coincidence and happenstance serve to solidify delusions of grandeur and suspicion of others. (Speaking of paranoid, there's
a funny throw-away reference to Richard Nixon, who at the time was all but counted out as a major political figure, serving
as the Director of the FBI. Though the prediction about Nixon's future in public service was a bit off-target, it took a
Dick to point out another Dick's penchant for paranoia.) To quote Dick on this character, "It is not the Russians I
fear: it is the Doctor Bluthgelds, the Doctor Bloodmoneys, in our own society, that terrify me."
Their intertwined fates unfold in, to again quote Dick, a world in which "society has reverted, but not to the brutal level that
we might expect." Some of them are transformed, not necessarily for the good, by this society; some cause the society to be
transformed, for better or worse. This is a novel about transformations, the creation of evil, and the sheer persistence
of the human spirit to overcome it its most mundane manifestations. Still relevant today, even if we aren't expecting the
bombs to fall on our heads any minute now -- because the bombs have taken other forms and they may still fall. Even without
our knowing it.
David Soyka is a former journalist and college teacher who writes the occasional short story and
freelance article. He makes a living writing corporate marketing communications, which is a kind of
fiction without the art.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2013 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide