Following up the successful hat-trick of The Lord of the Rings was always going to be tricky, but then Peter Jackson
is a filmmaker who seems to thrive upon risk. Who would have thought the director of Meet the Feebles could adapt J.R.R.
Tolkien's opus as well as he did in an age when Hollywood's idea of epic fantasy was Dragonheart. Several Oscars
later the director returns to the project he was trying to get off the ground before Rings, a remake of what is, without
question, one of the greatest movies of our genre, Ernest B. Schoedsack and Merian C. Cooper's 1933 masterpiece King Kong.
The odds Jackson faces this time are just as frightening. His remake is the third in a line of casualties that began with the
roundly despised Dino De Laurentiis-produced, John Guillermin-directed update of 1976, starring Jessica Lange, and Art
Scott and James A. Simon's animated musical The Mighty Kong of 1998, featuring the voice of Dudley Moore. And
let's not even get into the rip-offs and sequels like Inoshiro Honda's Kingukongu tai Gojira
(King Kong vs Godzilla, 1963) or Guillermin's dire sequel King Kong Lives (1986). So, has Jackson repeated the
trick of reinventing a cornerstone genre text for a new generation without betraying the spirit of the original? Short answer? No.
The magic of the original Kong resides in its resemblance to fairy tale, a grandiose symbolism that Jackson here tries
to describe in terms of comic-strip realism. While The Lord of the Rings movies benefit from their tangibly realistic
tone, the primal poetry of Kong evaporates on contact with mundane realism, disintegrating like faerie gold.
The bones of the original plot remain unchanged, albeit fleshed out with an extra hour and a half of details. It's
Depression-era New York and ruthless filmmaker Carl Denham (Jack Black) has just found out that swine Merian Cooper has
poached his leading lady for some picture or other at RKO. And this just minutes after Denham has stolen his own unfinished
movie from the moguls who threatened to cut off funding. Luckily, starving vaudeville entertainer Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts),
petite enough to fit into the required size four costumes, finds herself with little choice but to board the SS Venture
en route to Denham's next location.
Off on a trip for no one knows how long, to some spot Denham doesn't even hint at, the only woman on a ship with the toughest
mugs you ever looked at (among them Jamie Bell's thieving cabin boy and Andy Serkis as Popeye), Ann falls in love. Bruce Cabot
played her "heroic" beau in the original, a role here split into three: Thomas Kretschmann's grizzled German
skipper, Kyle Chandler's preening movie idol and Adrien Brody as Jack Driscoll, the soulful playwright Denham swindled
into scripting his movie. Having narrowly avoided a shipwreck on the jagged shores of Denham's secret location, an
uncharted rock known only as Skull Island, the crew are set upon by the cast of Cannibal Ferox, who sacrifice Ann to
something lurking on the other side of an ancient protective wall. Something big.
With Ann snatched into the wilderness by several mobile tons of animal fury, Jack plunges into the prehistoric jungle
after her, the gallant crew at his back. Denham, meanwhile, despite a rising body-count among his employees, still believes
there's a way he can save his picture and his reputation.
Peter Jackson's King Kong is a movie of three one-hour acts, of which the first feels by far the longest. (It's
anybody's guess why a dangling subplot concerning Jimmy the cabin boy couldn't have waited for the inevitable special
edition DVD.) And it's during this prolonged sea voyage that you begin to wonder just how respectful the movie's feelings
are towards the original. Fay Wray and Bruce Cabot's shipboard meeting ("I guess you don't think much of women on ships do
you?" "Nah, they're a nuisance.") here become lines from Denham's laughable B-movie as Watts and Chandler rehearse on
deck. Later, the native jig from the original gets recycled as part of a tacky Broadway revue. But the real problem with
this movie doesn't kick off in earnest until we're on Skull Island.
Remember that scene at the end of Return of the King, a moment which we all thought was a bit too silly, when Legolas
brings down a war elephant and surfs down its trunk like Fred Flintstone? Well, that's the tone for the whole of act two
of King Kong, a schoolboy jokiness that often threatened to spoil The Lord of the Rings ("Nobody tosses a
dwarf.") and which Jackson allows to get the better of him here. He treats us to some thrilling Harryhausen-style set-pieces,
but then quickly lets them get out of hand. A titanic tooth-and-claw smackdown between a 25-foot gorilla and not one but
THREE dinosaurs (you can almost hear Jackson squealing with boyish delight in the background), swiftly collapses from the
coolest thing you've ever seen to the dumbest.
Jackson simply doesn't know when to stop, and demonstrates none of the restraint that made The Lord of the Rings
work. By the time Denham (part-Peter Jackson, part-Captain Ahab) has dedicated his movie to the memory of yet another dead
employee, it's all become a farce. You may have to keep reminding yourself that this is a movie by Peter Jackson and not
Stephen Sommers, as Velociraptors get punched in the face, hungry T-Rexes swing from vines like monstrous trapeze artists,
and giant roaches get machine-gunned off of writhing victims. ("Just hold still!") By now the movie's lost it, all pretension
towards realism is gone and the spectacle is just there to be endured.
Dinosaurs, by the way, have definitely lost their wow-factor, although the other monsters on show are a hoot, including
swarms of demonic bats and giant bugs, and oodles of slobbering maggots (I really liked these). Performances by Jack Black,
Naomi Watts and Adrien Brody are in here somewhere, but who cares? Kong's the jungle VIP here and don't you forget it.
Jackson's reinvention of Hollywood's tallest darkest leading man is the movie's trump card. Scarred, matted, with jutting
tusks and flashing amber eyes, this Kong could have clambered from the pages of a yarn by Robert E. Howard, even his habitat
looks as if it were drawn into being by Frank Frazetta. Surrounded by the bones of his forefathers, he's the last of the
barbarian kings, Conan facing his final adventure, a prehistoric animal edging towards the final rung of the evolutionary
ladder, and you better believe he's not going down without one helluva fight.
It's a different movie when Kong's around; it almost works. Jackson forgoes the old school long shots and frames his
monstrous hero largely in close-up, giving him a terrifying animal recklessness as he barrels about the screen. His special
effects performance (a combination of CGI and motion-captured actor Andy "Gollum" Serkis) is staggering. He also has some
great scenes with Naomi Watts' resourceful damsel, although their exchanges are more Gorillas in the Mist than
Romeo and Juliet, even when they go skating together in Central Park. No, really.
The final hour set in the concrete jungles of New York probably owe more to the reviled 1976 version than the original,
while the final iconic scene atop the Empire State Building rather summarises the effect of Jackson's movie. Watch the
original Kong again (you could watch it twice within the running time of this movie). See those biplanes firing
relentlessly into the camera as Kong reels helplessly atop his perch, weakly swatting at his tormentors; it's not
combat, it's an execution, slow, inevitable, devastating. In Jackson's hands it becomes just another rip-roaring action
set-piece. It's the difference between poetry and popcorn. Not that Peter Jackson's King Kong is a disaster by
any means, just hollow, glib and desperately uneven. A disposable spectacular.