Lucifer's Crown | ||||||||
Lillian Stewart Carl | ||||||||
Five Star, 450 pages | ||||||||
|
A review by Jayme Lynn Blaschke
With Lucifer's Crown, Carl reclaims Christian mythology from the fundamentalist set,
and treats it as mythology as opposed to dogma. And she does it without the self-righteous and
judgmental trappings, taking on such issues as intolerance and blind faith head-on. Planted firmly
and unabashedly in the tradition of the Inklings, Lucifer's Crown evokes the
theology-steeped works of C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams -- a connection reinforced by repeated
references and allusions to Tolkien. Personal sacrifice, faith and redemption are the overarching
themes here, playing a pivotal role in the never-ending battle between good and evil. In that
aspect, Carl's book compares favorable to another classic work of Christian-themed fantasy,
The Book of the Dun Cow by Walter Wangerin, Jr.
But pigeonholing Lucifer's Crown as apocalyptic Christian fiction does a grave
disservice to the book and to readers. It's so much more than that. Carl has taken half a dozen or
more traditions and genres, mixing them together to forge an alloyed novel of unexpected
strength. Superficially, it's contemporary fantasy, with magical elements intruding on modern life,
but it is also equal parts historical tour-de-force, murder mystery, quest fantasy, romance,
Arthurian epic and alternate history of Wagnerian scope.
Lucifer's Crown begins with a group of history students from Southern Methodist
University in Texas visiting Glastonbury Abbey as part of a study abroad program. Led by their
professor Maggie Sinclair, the group stumbles across a murdered reporter and becomes entangled
in the ensuing police investigation. Complications multiply a hundredfold with the revelation that
Thomas London, the humble caretaker at Glastonbury, is in reality Thomas Becket -- one-time
Archbishop of Canterbury. Rather than suffering martyrdom in 1170 as history records, Becket's
faith failed him, and he allowed a young monk to die in his stead. Now, cursed with immortality
for his sin, he strives for redemption by serving as the guardian of the Holy Grail. The Dark
Powers that are gathering -- as Dark Powers are wont to do -- naturally have other plans, for both
Becket and the Grail.
Lucifer's Crown is, at its heart, a journey of forgiveness and redemption. The legend
of the Fisher King echoes throughout, and fans of Arthurian myth will positively work themselves
into a frenzy picking up on all the references and allusions Carl packs into the storyline.
Something of an Anglophile and a voracious historian as well, Carl never misses an opportunity to
drop some nifty historical fact into the narrative. Rather than bog down the story, these nuggets
add to the resonance of the tale, anchoring events to historic and thematic contexts. Even her
characters benefit from this approach, engaging repeatedly in intellectual contests of "can you top
this?" with each answer not only codifying their considerable knowledge of the past, but also
casting a bit of light on the inner person.
Two serious flaws work against the novel, however -- flaws made all the worse by being easily
correctable, to my mind. Carl opens the book by throwing almost the entire cast at the reader,
making it hard to grasp and identify with any of them, much less the setting of contemporary
Glastonbury. When the murder follows shortly thereafter, it's hard to feel anything other than a
good bit of confusion, which will certainly put a number of readers off. That's a shame, though,
because once the introductions are out of the way and the body's carted off the morgue, the plot
kicks in and everything sorts itself out. The other major problem I had with Lucifer's
Crown is infuriating simply because it's so utterly unnecessary: The novel takes place
in the final months of the year 2000. That's right, we're treated to yet another clichéd
end-of-the-millennium apocalypse. Other than hopelessly dating a story that otherwise manages to
be effectively timeless, the move is just downright dumb. First of all, Lucifer's Crown is
published in 2003, so that pretty much spoils the suspense, as the good guys obviously won. But
beyond that, who's to say that a monotheistic deity slavishly follows the Gregorian Calendar?
Wouldn't it be more logical to go by the Roman Calendar, since that was the one in widespread
use at the time of Christ's birth and death? Or the Julian Calendar, which came into being at the
same time as the early Christian church? Or maybe even the Babylonian Calendar, if you want to
get traditional with the Old Testament. Perhaps it's a minor point, but every time a date reference
came up, it jarred my suspension of disbelief, and that's the last thing a good story should do.
Despite those complaints, Lucifer's Crown is a densely-packed narrative of
uncommon complexity and richness. It's a challenging work and certainly not light reading,
but -- as is the case with the works of writers such as Gene Wolfe, for instance -- those who put
forth the effort will find themselves well-rewarded, indeed.
Jayme Lynn Blaschke graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in journalism. He writes science fiction and fantasy as well as related non-fiction, and serves as fiction editor for RevolutionSF.com. A collected volume of his speculative fiction interviews, Cosmosis, is due out from the University of Nebraska Press in 2004. His website can be found at http://www.exoticdeer.org/jayme.html |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide