|
by Rick Norwood
| |
| Sometimes a television episode can be good in itself, but bad for the series it's a part of. Two examples of this were broadcast last week, one on Voyager, one on The X-Files. | |
|
Star Trek Voyager, "Relativity" (***) by Nicholas Sagan, Bryan Fuller, and Michael Taylor | |
This is another story of the Federation Time Patrol from the 29th Century. A
"time" bomb has been planted aboard Voyager, and the Federation Timeship Relativity recruits
Seven of Nine to travel through time to locate when and where the bomb is/was/will be planted.
As one character says, "I gave up trying to keep my tenses straight years ago."
There is a lot of confusion, the kind that gives O'Brian headaches when he tries to work out
the temporal mechanics. Some of the paradoxes are enjoyable, as when Seven discusses the
events shown in the film First Contact (****). How does Seven know about these events? They
only became a matter of public record in Stardate 50893.5, while Voyager left the Alpha Quadrant
in Stardate 48315.6? No explanation is provided, but several possibilities come to mind, all of
them interesting. On the other hand, the unexplained fact that the bomb can be observed in its
hiding place aboard Voyager at a time prior to the time when the bomb is hidden is merely
annoying. And the three year delay between the time the bomb is planted and the time it is set to
explode seems merely arbitrary. Tuvok says, "Like most time paradoxes, it's implausible but not
necessarily illogical."
We do learn that the time police can arrest someone for a crime he would have been going
to commit.
Kate Mulgrew does a good job of playing her four year younger self, with her old hairdo.
The references to other episodes are enjoyable. This kind of internal consistency and intelligent
attention to detail keep Star Trek far ahead of most tv sf. And the flavor of infinitely
recomplicated time paradoxes reminds me of the kind of SF Robert Silverberg was writing in the
50s. Since most tv SF is stuck firmly where written SF was in the 30s, the plot seems
advanced -- relatively speaking.
| |
|
The X-Files, "Field Trip" (***) written by Frank Spotnitz, Vince Gilligan, and John Shiban | |
|
This is one of the 5% where Scully is right and Mulder is wrong. It's not flying saucers,
but rather hallucinogenic mushrooms, as we learn by neatly dropped visual hints long before either
Scully or Mulder suspect.
The rest of the show is an enjoyable pair of interlocked twin fantasies, with guest
appearances by Skinner and the Lone Gunmen.
So, what's so bad about a couple of three star episodes.
The problem is this.
If we do not care what happens to the characters in a series, we loose interest. But how
can you care what happens to characters if time travel can rewrite events, or even erase everyone.
With a heavy reliance on dreams, holodeck fantasies, and time travel, Voyager is in danger of
causing our suspension of disbelief to come crashing down around it.
And X-Files is already asking us to swallow a lot. Too many episodes that are
hallucinations, imaginary stories, or, in one case, a comic book are going to make viewers ready to
send the series to the twilight zone.
| |
|
Rick Norwood is a mathematician and writer whose small press publishing house, Manuscript Press, has published books by Hal Clement, R.A. Lafferty, and Hal Foster. He is also the editor of Comics Revue Monthly, which publishes such classic comic strips as Flash Gordon, Sky Masters, Modesty Blaise, Tarzan, Odd Bodkins, Casey Ruggles, The Phantom, Gasoline Alley, Krazy Kat, Alley Oop, Little Orphan Annie, Barnaby, Buz Sawyer, and Steve Canyon. |
|
|
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2008 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide