Big Planet | ||||||||||||
Jack Vance | ||||||||||||
Orion Millennium Books, 218 pages | ||||||||||||
|
A review by Nick Gevers
Big Planet was Vance's first major SF novel, his second book of importance after his equally seminal fantasy
cycle The Dying Earth (1950); and like The Dying Earth, Big Planet was a triumph of ironic
narration. At every turn, Vance was engaging in acute social satire and tricks with perception. His plot centres on a
mission by a group of Earthmen to Big Planet, which, vast and metal-poor, is infinitely barbaric, an endless
tapestry of backward and predatory societies, and as such deeply problematic for the refined liberal consciences
of the people of Earth System, the civilized majority Big Planet's colonists left behind. Big Planet is a sea
of inhumanity, and arms smugglers are investing its nastier tyrants, in particular the impishly titled Bajarnum
of Beaujolais, with the power to become more brutal yet. Claude Glystra and his team of investigators arrive in
Big Planet's solar system determined to make a difference, to end the illegal arms trade and related dealing in
slaves, and thus defang the Bajarnum. But Vance's cunning narrative suggests from the start the impossibility of
this project: the space travellers are as disparate and in conflict as Big Planet's inhabitants, and their ship
is sabotaged, crash landing in Beaujolain territory. Now, instead of intervening from on high, Glystra and his
colleagues must escape the Bajarnum's troops and agents, and strive somehow to reach Earth Enclave, which lies on
the other side of the planet.
Within larger contexts of idealism radically challenged and the powerful rendered powerless, Vance makes many
telling points as his richly dramatic adventure story unfolds. The members of the expedition, gradually picked
off by crafty enemies as they flee the Beaujolains, perforce adopt barbaric habits of their own: murder, desperately
destructive ploys, the taking of concubines, the cruel manipulation of the strange cultures they encounter. And
all the while, the question of what constitutes civilization comes under scrutiny: the Beaujolains may be
barbarians, but what then are the far more savage cannibal Gypsies and Rebbirs of the Steppes? And if Earth
constitutes the acme of humane order, what should one think of Kirstendale, a highly cultivated city state
which appears to have found quite reasonable answers to the problems of social inequality? What price Earth's
assumed monopoly on wisdom when the seers of Myrtlesee Fountain have discovered logic in its quintessential
form? The most thorny paradoxes faced by anthropologists -- concerning the relative values to be attached to
differing social adaptations, and the feasibility of external intervention in morally problematic indigenous
dispensations -- are very intelligently dramatized in Big Planet, and no easy resolutions are proposed. In
that respect the novel's conclusion is brilliantly and deviously apt.
Big Planet, then, is thoughtful adventure fiction, important because it first raised issues and first
employed techniques subsequently integral to the entire SF genre. It contains many incidental pleasures: evocative
descriptive prose, highly charged and witty dialogue, hilarious set-piece confrontations between
adversaries, interludes of nightmarish violence; it is still a work of deft exciting fluency; it is an
authentic masterpiece, the true founding father of the planetary romance, that sub-genre of masterpieces.
Since completing a Ph.D. on uses of history in SF, Nick Gevers has become a moderately prolific reviewer and interviewer in the field of speculative fiction. He has published in INTERZONE, NOVA EXPRESS, the NEW YORK REVIEW OF SF, and GALAXIES; much of his work is available at INFINITY PLUS, of which he is Associate Editor. He lives in Cape Town, South Africa. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you find any errors, typos or anything else worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide