 



 
| by Derek Johnson 
 | ||||||||||
| [Editor's Note: Here you will find the other Watching the Future columns.] 
 
 
 
 The 80s saw so many fascinating genre entries -- many with their own brand of genuine visual lunacy -- that, in a way, it rivals the previous period. Similarities exist. A resurgent conservatism marked Ronald Reagan's inauguration, and paranoia eerily similar to that of the Eisenhower years gripped the United States. The threat of nuclear annihilation -- not just destroying the Earth in a ball of fire, but freezing it into radioactive sludge -- seemed not only inevitable but imminent, especially with the downing of Korean Air Lines Flight 007 by Soviet interceptors in the fall of 1983. Given the zeitgeist and realpolitik, who wouldn't have gravitated to the modern day equivalents of The Fly (1958), Kiss Me Deadly (1955), Gojira (1954), and Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)? Well, lots of people, when you think about it. No matter how often its detractors dismiss science fiction as either kids' stuff or, worse, trash, an honest assessment of many of the titles released between 1980 and 1989 demonstrates just the plain wrongness of both. True, some movies were aimed at children no matter what their age (E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (1982), Explorers (1985), *batteries not included (1987)). Studios did glut local multiplexes with a lot of trash (Millennium (1989), The Running Man (1987), My Science Project (1985), Outland (1981), Battle Beyond the Stars (1980)). But dismissing the era because of its worst common denominators also means refusing to acknowledge the standouts, to say nothing of the classics. 
 But really, even those only tell part of the story. Good as they are, they don't quite convey the batshit crazy shimmer of some of the lesser known (by modern standards, anyway) celluloid gems. One finds fear of environmental degradation and Big Brother capitalism in Blade Runner, but things like The Road Warrior (1982), its sequel Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985), RoboCop (1987) and They Live (1988) dig under your skin in a way that's more immediate. The Thing may sublimely spark our paranoia of the alien within, but The Terminator (1984), with the governor of California in the role he was born (or created) to play, amps that factor way past 11. Aliens shields its Vietnam allegory (one of many released during the period) by switching the action to an alien planet, but John McTiernan brings it much closer to home in Predator (1987), though its setting is South America (which, at the time also became a burgeoning realpolitik nodal point). And while few filmmakers can match Terry Gilliam's surrealist vision of Joseph K. and/or Winston Smith as Walter Mitty, it didn't stop filmmakers like Alex Cox (Repo Man (1985)) or Slava Tsukeman (Liquid Sky (1982)) from trying. These movies are still a gas, but they begin to show their age; it's hard to watch Repo Man and not laugh at the punk styles, or snicker at Roddy Piper's mullet in They Live, but once you get past their genuinely period concerns, resisting their raw energy and entertainment factor becomes difficult. 
 
 
And a number of films dealt sometimes nobly, sometimes gratingly, with the threat of annihilation.  The Day
After (1983) scared the bejeezus out of me in 1983, with its manic view of a society dealing with impending
nuclear disaster and its aftermath, but the older I get, the more I find the quieter breakdowns of
Testament (1983) far more compelling.  I remember wanting to love War Games (1983), but after
reading William Gibson's "Burning Chrome" in Omni (at about the same time I caught repeat showings
 
 Not all of these movies were great. Enjoying some meant adjusting one's standards of excellence. But they remain unique, a microcosm of a period long since past, and one that cannot be recaptured. Though I've heard tell of a studio attempting to remake Escape from New York (and that Ridley Scott is making, of all things, a sequel to Blade Runner), they simply aren't of the same period. To remake them misses the point of why they were made. They'd be bled of context. Still, as with any genre, science fiction is not about the future but the present, and the genre's Second Golden Age remains a remarkable record of the period's fears, frustrations... and, in the case of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, its hopes. To view them is to view the 80s through a funhouse mirror, or a distorted lens. Take it from somebody who was there: sometimes, it was the only way things made sense. | ||||||||||
| 
 Derek Johnson's critical work has appeared on SF Site, SF Signal, and Revolution SF. His first novel, the erotic thriller, Murder, Most Likely, written in collaboration with SammyJo Hunt, will be published by Rebel Ink Press this December. He lives in Central Texas with the Goddess. | 
|       | 
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site   All Rights Reserved Worldwide