The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (****) | ||||||
directed by Peter Jackson | ||||||
written by Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, and Guillermo del Toro, from the book by J.R.R. Tolkien | ||||||
Rick Norwood
I'll begin with the bad and then move on to the good, but I had better disclose that The Hobbit is easily one of my ten
favorite books of all time, up there with Robert A. Heinlein's Citizen of the Galaxy, Jane Austin's Sense and Sensibility,
Alfred Bester's The Demolished Man, E.M. Forster's A Room With a View, T.H. White's The Once and Future King,
Robert Lewis Stevenson's Treasure Island, Rudyard Kipling's The Just-So Stories, Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird,
and J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings.
The worst thing in the film is the brief bathroom humor, which is totally out of place. I understand that if a film gets
a G rating, it loses some percentage of its audience, so bathroom humor is a commercial necessity. I still hate it here. I have
no objection to bathroom humor in an Adam Sandler movie, but it does not belong in The Hobbit.
I am saddened by Peter Jackson's decision to make the villains repulsive. Tolkien's villains are often monsters, but
never repulsive. Some monsters are beautiful.
Which brings us to the dragon Smaug. I applaud Jackson's decision never to show Smaug in this film, only his shadow or a
flash of his tail, but this puts all the more pressure on Jackson to do justice to Smaug in the next Hobbit film, and I doubt
he can pull it off. Tolkien's painting of Smaug is too good to be captured on film.
My feelings about the big battles that take up much of the film are more ambiguous. The Hobbit is a story of character
and setting. Peter Jackson's film is a thrill ride. I know that movies are not novels, and that a charming film of The Hobbit
would not sell as many tickets as an action adventure film. The action is very well done. The scenes in the goblin cave are
more like a Roadrunner and Coyote cartoon than anything else, and that is high praise indeed. But I would like a charming
film of The Hobbit better.
The movie introduces a major villain, the orc Azog, who in the book The Hobbit is mentioned only once. In the mythos he is
killed in Moria long before Bilbo is born. I can accept the need for a villain. But I think (and talking to friends I am not
alone in thinking) that the climax of this first film of this trilogy would have been much stronger had Azog been killed.
The best thing in the film is Bilbo Baggins, whose character is totally believable. This alone is a difficult and worthy feat
that warrants four stars. Gandalf also is very good.
I like the use of many characters and actors from the Lord of the Rings films in the introduction to this film. I had misgivings
about the use of Radaghast the Brown in the story, but wound up liking it. It sits well in memory. Saruman the White is also
in the movie but not in the book.
Gandalf pretends not to remember the names of the other two wizards, and to be sure their names were never published in
Tolkien's lifetime, but do appear in Unfinished Tales. They are Alatar and Pallando.
Rick Norwood is a mathematician and writer whose small press publishing house, Manuscript Press, has published books by Hal Clement, R.A. Lafferty, and Hal Foster. He is also the editor of Comics Revue Monthly, which publishes such classic comic strips as Flash Gordon, Sky Masters, Modesty Blaise, Tarzan, Odd Bodkins, Casey Ruggles, The Phantom, Gasoline Alley, Krazy Kat, Alley Oop, Little Orphan Annie, Barnaby, Buz Sawyer, and Steve Canyon. Visit his web site at comicsrevue.com. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you find any errors, typos or other stuff worth mentioning,
please send it to editor@sfsite.com.
Copyright © 1996-2014 SF Site All Rights Reserved Worldwide